Determination of best focus and exposure dose using CD-SEM side-wall imaging

被引:17
作者
Marschner, T [1 ]
Eytan, G [1 ]
Dror, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Infineon Technol GmbH, DD PL ALT, D-01099 Dresden, Germany
来源
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XV | 2001年 / 4344卷
关键词
CD-metrology; CD-SEM; focus-exposure matrix; side-wall profiles;
D O I
10.1117/12.436761
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We use CD-SEM side-wall imaging using the Applied Materials VeraSEM 3d system as a destruction free and quick method to determine side-wall profiles. The system allows the reconstruction of profiles by tilting the SEM beam up to 6 degrees. Using two different tilt angles the reconstruction of side-wall profiles is possible in a quick and destruction free way even for negatively sloped profiles. The use of the profile analysis utility is believed to reduce cycle time significantly especially for process development and troubleshooting in production. We compare profiles obtained from the profile analysis utility of the VeraSEM 3D to X-SEM measurements to qualify this method for use in development and high volume production. For selected examples containing resist lines we investigate process windows determined from top-down CD measurements, X-SEM measurements and the profile analysis utility and compare the best stepper focus and exposure dose values obtained from these methods. It is shown how the results from the profile analysis utility can be used for process monitoring by comparing the obtained data to reference data from FEM wafers.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 365
页数:11
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Feature integrity monitoring for process control using a CD SEM [J].
Allgair, J ;
Chen, G ;
Marples, S ;
Goodstein, D ;
Miller, J ;
Santos, F .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIV, 2000, 3998 :227-231
[2]  
Banke B, 1999, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V3677, P291, DOI 10.1117/12.350818
[3]   Comparison of electrical CD measurements and cross-section lattice-plane counts of sub-micrometer features replicated in (100) silicon-on-insulator material [J].
Cresswell, MW ;
Bonevich, JE ;
Headley, TJ ;
Allen, RA ;
Giannuzzi, LA ;
Everist, SC ;
Ghoshtagore, RN ;
Shea, PJ .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIV, 2000, 3998 :74-83
[4]  
Finders J., 1997, Proceedings of the Microlithography Seminar INTERFACE '97, P17
[5]   AFM: A valid reference tool? [J].
Marchman, HM ;
Dunham, N .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XII, 1998, 3332 :2-9
[6]   Approach to CD SEM metrology utilizing the full waveform signal [J].
McIntosh, JM ;
Kane, BC ;
Bindell, JB ;
Vartuli, CB .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XII, 1998, 3332 :51-60
[7]   CD-SEM precision - Improved procedure & analysis [J].
Menaker, M .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3677 :272-279
[8]   Accuracy and traceability in dimensional measurements [J].
Potzick, J .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XII, 1998, 3332 :471-479
[9]   CD SEM edge width applications and analysis [J].
Solecky, E ;
Cornell, R .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3677 :315-323
[10]   Shape control using sidewall imaging [J].
Su, B ;
Oshana, R ;
Menaker, M ;
Barak, Y .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIV, 2000, 3998 :232-238