Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: Parietal interactions

被引:49
作者
Gillebert, Celine R. [2 ]
Dyrholm, Mads [3 ]
Vangkilde, Signe [3 ]
Kyllingsbaek, Soren [3 ]
Peeters, Ronald [4 ]
Vandenberghe, Rik [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Neurol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Lab Cognit Neurol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Visual Cognit, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[4] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Radiol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
fMRI; Visual attention; Working memory; Intraparietal sulcus; Temporoparietal junction; ABRUPT VISUAL ONSETS; WORKING-MEMORY; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; NEURAL MECHANISMS; SPATIAL ATTENTION; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; FRONTAL-CORTEX; HUMAN BRAIN; RIGHT TPJ;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.038
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) has been implicated in selective attention as well as visual short-term memory (VSTM). To contrast mechanisms of target selection, distracter filtering, and access to VSTM, we combined behavioral testing, computational modeling and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sixteen healthy subjects participated in a change detection task in which we manipulated both target and distracter set sizes. We directly compared the IPS response as a function of the number of targets and distracters in the display and in VSTM. When distracters were not present, the posterior and middle segments of IPS showed the predicted asymptotic activity increase with an increasing target set size. When distracters were added to a single target, activity also increased as predicted. However, the addition of distracters to multiple targets suppressed both middle and posterior IPS activities, thereby displaying a significant interaction between the two factors. The interaction between target and distracter set size in IPS could not be accounted for by a simple explanation in terms of number of items accessing VSTM. Instead, it led us to a model where items accessing VSTM receive differential weights depending on their behavioral relevance, and secondly, a suppressive effect originates during the selection phase when multiple targets and multiple distracters are simultaneously present. The reverse interaction between target and distracter set size was significant in the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), where activity was highest for a single target compared to any other condition. Our study reconciles the role of middle IPS in attentional selection and biased competition with its role in VSTM access. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1551 / 1562
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[21]  
Duncan J., 1996, ATTENTION PERFORM, P549
[22]   Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: The case of TVA [J].
Dyrholm, Mads ;
Kyllingsbaek, Soren ;
Espeseth, Thomas ;
Bundesen, Claus .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 55 (06) :416-429
[23]   Single-Trial Inference on Visual Attention [J].
Dyrholm, Mads ;
Kyllingsbaek, Soren ;
Vangkilde, Signe ;
Habekost, Thomas ;
Bundesen, Claus .
2011 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL MODELS FOR LIFE SCIENCES (CMLS-11), 2011, 1371 :37-43
[24]   Surround Suppression Sharpens the Priority Map in the Lateral Intraparietal Area [J].
Falkner, Annegret L. ;
Krishna, B. Suresh ;
Goldberg, Michael E. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 30 (38) :12787-12797
[25]   Influence of early attentional modulation on working memory [J].
Gazzaley, Adam .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (06) :1410-1424
[26]   Lesion evidence for the critical role of the intraparietal sulcus in spatial attention [J].
Gillebert, Celine R. ;
Mantini, Dante ;
Thijs, Vincent ;
Sunaert, Stefan ;
Dupont, Patrick ;
Vandenberghe, Rik .
BRAIN, 2011, 134 :1694-1709
[27]   Visualization of Group Inference Data in Functional Neuroimaging [J].
Glaescher, Jan .
NEUROINFORMATICS, 2009, 7 (01) :73-82
[28]   The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex [J].
Gottlieb, JP ;
Kusunoki, M ;
Goldberg, ME .
NATURE, 1998, 391 (6666) :481-484
[29]   Patient assessment based on a theory of visual attention (TVA): subtle deficits after a right frontal-subcortical lesion [J].
Habekost, T ;
Bundesen, C .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2003, 41 (09) :1171-1188
[30]   A Boolean map theory of visual attention [J].
Huang, Liqiang ;
Pashler, Harold .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 114 (03) :599-631