Diagnostic Construct Validity of MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Scale Scores

被引:23
作者
Sellbom, Martin [1 ]
Bagby, R. Michael [2 ]
Kushner, Shauna [3 ]
Quilty, Lena C. [4 ]
Ayearst, Lindsay E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Psychol, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
MMPI-2-RF; differential diagnosis; construct validity; CLINICAL RC SCALES; DSM-IV ANXIETY; MOOD DISORDERS; DEPRESSION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; METAANALYSIS; PERSONALITY; BEHAVIOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/1073191111428763
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In the current investigation, the authors examined the diagnostic construct validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in a patient sample. All participants were diagnosed via the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I/P). The data set used in this study was composed of 544 patients-67 with bipolar disorder, 407 with major depressive disorder, and 70 with schizophrenia. Multivariate analyses revealed a pattern of mean scale differences among patient groups that was mostly consistent with the prominent features of each diagnostic group; logistic regression analyses identified a number of scales that were strong, unique predictors in the differentiation between pairs of diagnostic groups. The higher order scales (H-O)-the Emotional/Internalizing Dysfunction (EID) and Thought Dysfunction (THD) scales were most useful in differentiating between patient groups. For differentiating bipolar disorder patients from the other diagnostic groups, the Activation (ACT) Specific Problem scale was most useful. Although not all hypothesized scale differences emerged; overall, the pattern of results provides support for the diagnostic construct validity of the MMPI-2-RF scales.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 186
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MINNESOTA MULTIPHASI
[2]   Distinguishing bipolar depression, major depression, and schizophrenia with the MMPI-2 clinical and content scales [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Marshall, MB ;
Basso, MR ;
Nicholson, RA ;
Bacchiochi, J ;
Miller, LS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2005, 84 (01) :89-95
[3]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 1991, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V3, P634
[4]  
Ben-Porath Y. S., 2008, MINNESOTA MULTIPHASI
[5]   Current and lifetime comorbidity of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders in a large clinical sample [J].
Brown, TA ;
Campbell, LA ;
Lehman, CL ;
Grisham, JR ;
Mancill, RB .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 110 (04) :585-599
[6]   Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal [J].
Brown, TA ;
Chorpita, BF ;
Barlow, DH .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 107 (02) :179-192
[7]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[8]  
First MB., 1997, STRUCTURED CLIN INTE
[9]  
Forbey J.D., 2007, PSYCHOL SERV, V4, P46, DOI DOI 10.1037/1541-1559.4.1.46
[10]   Correlates of the MMPI-2-RF in a College Setting [J].
Forbey, Johnathan D. ;
Lee, Tayla T. C. ;
Handel, Richard W. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2010, 22 (04) :737-744