A critical examination of the EO-performance relationship

被引:65
作者
Andersen, Jim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Orebro, Swedish Business Sch, Orebro, Sweden
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR & RESEARCH | 2010年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
Entrepreneurialism; Multivariate analysis; Research methods; Organizational performance; Small to medium-sized enterprises; ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION; CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP; RISK-TAKING; ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS PERFORMANCE; SUBJECTIVE MEASURES; METHOD VARIANCE; FIRM; PROFITABILITY; CAPABILITIES;
D O I
10.1108/13552551011054507
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the assertion that there is a statistical significant relationship between EO and performance. Design/methodology/approach - In several publications it has been stated that there is a positive relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and the performance of a firm. These studies have generally used the same core references, and these seminal contributions are examined critically in this article. The EO-performance relationship is also analyzed in an empirical study, consisting of 172 Swedish SMEs in the manufacturing sector. Findings - The result of the literature review is that the notion of a positive EO-performance relationship can be questioned. Earlier studies have neglected some important issues, mainly regarding the use of perceptual performance data, common method biases and survival biases. Some of the conclusions presented are supported by the empirical study. Originality/value - The main point of this paper is to show that the relationship between EO and performance is more complicated than previous studies have implied. More care should be taken when generalizing the results of core references and scholars ought to have a more cautious approach when stating that there is a general correlation between EO and performance.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Andersen Jim, 2007, Journal of European Industrial Training, V31, P660, DOI 10.1108/03090590710833697
[2]  
[Anonymous], STRATEGIC CHANGE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INT J SOCIAL EC
[4]   PROFITABILITY, UNCERTAINTY, AND FIRM SIZE [J].
BALLANTINE, JW ;
CLEVELAND, FW ;
KOELLER, CT .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 1993, 5 (02) :87-100
[5]   Are we family and are we treated as family? Nonfamily employees' perceptions of justice in the family firm [J].
Barnett, Tim ;
Kellermanns, Franz W. .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2006, 30 (06) :837-854
[6]  
Becherer RC, 1999, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V37, P28
[7]  
Becherer RC., 1997, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V22, P47, DOI 10.1177/104225879702200103
[8]   ON THE INTERCHANGEABILITY OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BOMMER, WH ;
JOHNSON, JL ;
RICH, GA ;
PODSAKOFF, PM ;
MACKENZIE, SB .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 48 (03) :587-605
[9]   Self-reports and CEO locus of control research: A note [J].
Boone, C ;
de Brabander, B .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1997, 18 (06) :949-971
[10]  
BOURGEOIS LJ, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P548, DOI 10.5465/256113