Responses of a small mammal community to heterogeneity along forest-old-field edges

被引:70
|
作者
Manson, RH [1 ]
Ostfeld, RS [1 ]
Canham, CD [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA
关键词
Blarina brevicauda; competition; ecological model system; ecotones edge effects; forest edge; macrohabitat; microhabitat; Microtus pennsylvanicus; old-field; Peromyscus leucopus; predation; seed predation; seedling;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008093823391
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Despite the importance of edges effects in ecological systems, the causes and consequences of animal responses to habitat edges are largely unknown. We used three years of live-trapping and measures of the plant community around trap stations to explore the responses of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus), meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), and short-tailed shrews (Blarina brevicauda) to forest-field edges in upstate New York. We found that capture probabilities of voles were highest in grass- and forb-dominated micro-habitats and in old-field zones distant from the forest edge. In contrast, capture probabilities of white-footed mice were highest in shrub-dominated microhabitats and in zones near the forest edge. Short-tailed shrews did not show strong micro- or macrohabitat associations. The responses by voles, the competitive dominant in our system, to variation along forest-field edges were more consistent across years than were those of the competitively inferior, white-footed mouse. Mice were less likely to use the old-field interiors when vole density was high than when it was low, suggesting competitive displacement of mice by voles. Finally, we found good agreement between the spatial activity patterns of mice and voles in old-fields and their impacts on patterns of survival of tree seeds and seedlings in concurrent studies. These results suggest that a dynamic interaction exists between the plant and animal communities along forest edges.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 367
页数:13
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Responses of a small mammal community to heterogeneity along forest-old-field edges
    Robert H. Manson
    Richard S. Ostfeld
    Charles D. Canham
    Landscape Ecology, 1999, 14 : 355 - 367
  • [2] Small-mammal abundance differs between pipelines, edges, and interior boreal forest habitat
    Darling, A. F.
    Leston, L.
    Bayne, E. M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2019, 97 (10) : 880 - 894
  • [3] Size-biased compositional impacts of small mammal herbivores in an old-field plant community
    Gridzak, Riley
    Wylie, Rebecca
    Bennett, Will
    Schamp, Brandon S.
    PLANT ECOLOGY, 2023, 224 (05) : 513 - 521
  • [4] Small mammal responses to forest management for oak regeneration in southern Indiana
    Urban, Natasha A.
    Swihart, Robert K.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 261 (03) : 353 - 361
  • [5] Small-mammal community structure in a South American deciduous Atlantic Forest
    Melo, G. L.
    Sponchiado, J.
    Machado, A. F.
    Caceres, N. C.
    COMMUNITY ECOLOGY, 2011, 12 (01) : 58 - 66
  • [6] Long-term effects of rodent herbivores on tree invasion dynamics along forest-field edges
    Manson, RH
    Ostfeld, RS
    Canham, CD
    ECOLOGY, 2001, 82 (12) : 3320 - 3329
  • [7] End of the road: Short-term responses of a large mammal community to forest road decommissioning
    Lacerte, Rebecca
    Leblond, Mathieu
    St-Laurent, Martin-Hugues
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2022, 69
  • [8] Differential responses of coexisting owls to annual small mammal population fluctuations in temperate mixed forest
    Ratajc, Urska
    Breskvar, Martin
    Dzeroski, Saso
    Vrezec, Al
    IBIS, 2022, 164 (02) : 535 - 551
  • [9] Influence of an old field/forest edge on a northeastern United States deciduous forest understory community
    Goldblum, D
    Beatty, SW
    JOURNAL OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 126 (04): : 335 - 343
  • [10] Ecosystem and decomposer effects on litter dynamics along an old field to old-growth forest successnional gradient
    Mayer, Paul M.
    ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2008, 33 (02): : 222 - 230