The role of innovative entrepreneurship in the economic development of EU member countries

被引:23
作者
Crudu, Rodica [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Econ Studies Moldova, Fac Int Econ Relat, 61 Banulescu Bodoni Str, MD-2005 Kishinev, Moldova
关键词
innovation; entrepreneurship; new firms' creation; European Union; economic growth; KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVER THEORY; BUSINESS OWNERSHIP; GROWTH; EMPLOYMENT; CREATE; IMPACT; TIME; JOBS;
D O I
10.7341/20191512
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the specialized literature, entrepreneurship has been acknowledged to have a salient role in driving innovation, economic growth, and welfare, in addition to its effect on job creation. Researchers have expressed different views about the relationship between economic development and entrepreneurship throughout time. It is also considered that innovation is a driving force in the economic development of nations. Therefore, innovative entrepreneurship started to be considered a key factor in modern economic development. For instance, SMEs and innovation lay at the core of the European Union's development strategy-Europe 2020 strategy. The aim of the article is to analyze the role of innovative entrepreneurship in the economic development of EU member states. Taking into consideration that both processes: economic development and innovative entrepreneurship are multi faceted, the article comes to express the relationship between the two phenomena and its specifics in EU member countries. Given the nature of contemporary highlights of the literature review and the stated research objective, in this article, a model was tested that captures the new or young and innovative firms, as aspects of innovative entrepreneurship and determinants of the economic growth rates. The research method used is regression model analysis. For the statistical data analysis and processing, Stata and SPSS soft ware tools were used. The key findings of the paper show that innovative entrepreneurs (being measured by the Total Early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) innovation level) are more present in countries with higher development levels and higher incomes, being motivated by the improvement opportunity they see in becoming entrepreneurs. However, a higher degree of entrepreneurship, especially new firms' creation, does not substantially contribute to accelerated economic development. This is explained by the variation in the motivation (necessity or improvement oriented) entrepreneurs across EU countries. In the developed countries, the entrepreneurs are most likely to be the Schumpeterian type, while in developing countries most of them are shopkeepers. Consequently, it is clear that EU member countries need friendlier and more efficient new firms' creation policies, as well as SME supporting tools. The paper has significant practical implications for decision and policy-making authorities in terms of possible directions for innovative entrepreneurship policy development.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 60
页数:26
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Acs Z., 2016, SMALL BUSINESS EC, V47, P1
[2]  
Acs Z. J, 2003, 0302 CES US BUR CENS
[3]   Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Armington, C .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2004, 38 (08) :911-927
[4]   The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Audretsch, David B. ;
Lehmann, Erik E. .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2013, 41 (04) :757-774
[5]   A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
AGHION, P ;
HOWITT, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) :323-351
[6]   INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A SOURCE OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE REGION [J].
Andreeva, E. L. ;
Simon, H. ;
Karkh, D. A. ;
Glukhikh, P. L. .
EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2016, 12 (03) :899-910
[7]  
[Anonymous], The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle
[8]  
Anvert M, 2010, NEW APPROACH INNOVAT
[9]  
Audretsch D.B., 1995, INNOVATION IND EVOLU
[10]   Entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Boente, Werner ;
Keilbach, Max .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2008, 23 (06) :687-698