Heavy-Truck Drivers' Following Behavior With Intervention of an Integrated, In-Vehicle Crash Warning System: A Field Evaluation

被引:35
作者
Bao, Shan [1 ]
LeBlanc, David J. [1 ]
Sayer, James R. [1 ]
Flannagan, Carol [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Transportat Res Inst, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
heavy truck; time headway; in-vehicle crash warning system; rear-end crash; REAR-END COLLISIONS; TIME; ACCIDENTS;
D O I
10.1177/0018720812439412
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: This study is designed to evaluate heavy-truck drivers' following behavior and how a crash warning system influences their headway maintenance. Background: Rear-end crashes are one of the major crash types involving heavy trucks and are more likely than other crash types to result in fatalities. Previous studies have observed positive effects of in-vehicle crash warning systems in passenger car drivers. Although heavy-truck drivers are generally more experienced, driver-related errors are still the leading factors contributing to heavy-truck-related rear-end crashes. Method: Data from a 10-month naturalistic driving study were used. Participants were 18 professional heavy-truck drivers who received warnings during the last 8 months of the study (treatment period) but not during the first 2 months (baseline period). Time headway and driver's brake reaction time were extracted and compared with condition variables, including one between-subjects variable (driver shift) and five within-subjects variables (treatment condition, roadway types, traffic density, wiper state, and trailer configuration). Results: The presence of warnings resulted in a 0.28-s increase of mean time headway with dense on-road traffic and a 0.20-s increase with wipers on. Drivers also responded to the forward conflicts significantly faster (by 0.26 s, a 15% enhancement) in the treatment condition compared with responses in the baseline condition. Conclusion: Positive effects on heavy-truck drivers' following performance were observed with the warning system. Application: The installation of such in-vehicle crash warning systems can help heavy-truck drivers keep longer headway distances in challenging situations and respond quicker to potential traffic conflicts, therefore possibly increasing heavy-truck longitudinal driving safety.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 697
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure [J].
Abdel-Aty, M ;
Abdelwahab, H .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2004, 36 (03) :447-456
[2]   The influence of heavy goods vehicle traffic on accidents on different types of Spanish interurban roads [J].
Arenas Ramirez, B. ;
Aparicio Izquierdo, F. ;
Gonzalez Fernandez, C. ;
Gomez Mendez, A. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2009, 41 (01) :15-24
[3]   Effects of an in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system on short- and long-term driving performance [J].
Ben-Yaacov, A ;
Maltz, M ;
Shinar, D .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2002, 44 (02) :335-342
[4]   ACCIDENT RATES FOR HEAVY TRUCK-TRACTORS IN MICHIGAN [J].
BLOWER, D ;
CAMPBELL, KL ;
GREEN, PE .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1993, 25 (03) :307-321
[5]  
Blower D., 1999, UMTRI9941 U MICH TRA
[6]   Analysis of injury severity and vehicle occupancy in truck- and non-truck-involved accidents [J].
Chang, LY ;
Mannering, F .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1999, 31 (05) :579-592
[7]   Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices [J].
Dingus, TA ;
McGehee, DV ;
Manakkal, N ;
Jahns, SK ;
Carney, C ;
Hankey, JM .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1997, 39 (02) :216-229
[8]  
Ervin R., 2005, 809900 DOT HS NAT HI
[9]  
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2007, LARG TRUCK BUS CRASH
[10]  
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2001, REAR END LARG TRUCK