Child and parent responses to a brain injury screening questionnaire

被引:26
作者
Cantor, JB [1 ]
Gordon, WA [1 ]
Schwartz, ME [1 ]
Charatz, HJ [1 ]
Ashman, TA [1 ]
Abramowitz, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2004年 / 85卷 / 04期
关键词
brain injuries; disabled children; questionnaires; rehabilitation; signs and symptoms; schools;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.113
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine, by using a Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire (BISQ), in a sample of urban public school students, what proportion of children are at risk for having sustained a brain injury, to measure the incidence of blows to the head and alterations in mental status, and to determine whether children and parents report differently on the BISQ. Design: Survey. Setting: Research facility and community. Participants: A total of 137 urban students (age range, 12-19y) of varied ethnicity, who were recruited in 2 public schools, and their parents. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: The BISQ as completed by children and parents. Results: Fourteen children (10%) were at risk for having sustained a brain injury because they or their parents reported an alteration in mental status and 5 or more symptoms sensitive and specific to traumatic brain injury. Most children were reported to have experienced blows to the head, and 50% were reported to have experienced an alteration in mental status. In all areas, no significant differences were found between parent and child reports. Conclusions: There may be significant numbers of children with undetected brain injury in schools. The BISQ is a useful tool to identify children at risk for having sustained a brain injury. Histories should be obtained from parents and children who are older than 11 years when screening children for brain injury.
引用
收藏
页码:S54 / S60
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[2]   Attentional skills following traumatic brain injury in childhood: a componential analysis [J].
Anderson, V ;
Fenwick, T ;
Manly, T ;
Robertson, I .
BRAIN INJURY, 1998, 12 (11) :937-949
[3]  
Anderson V A, 1997, J Int Neuropsychol Soc, V3, P568
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V8, P86, DOI DOI 10.1097/00001199-199309000-00010
[5]   NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COLLEGE-STUDENTS WITH LEARNING-DISABILITIES AND THOSE WITH MILD HEAD-INJURY [J].
BEERS, SR ;
GOLDSTEIN, G ;
KATZ, LJ .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 1994, 27 (05) :315-324
[6]  
BLASKEY J, 1999, DECISION MAKING PEDI, P84
[7]   MINOR HEAD-INJURY IN CHILDREN - OUT OF SIGHT BUT NOT OUT OF MIND [J].
BOLL, TJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 12 (01) :74-80
[8]   Support for children following traumatic brain injury: the views of Educational Psychologists [J].
Brooks, BM ;
Rose, FD ;
Johnson, DA ;
Andrews, TK ;
Gulamali, R .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 25 (01) :51-56
[9]   Traumatic brain injury in children: Issues in community function [J].
Cronin, AF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2001, 55 (04) :377-384
[10]   How education should respond to students with traumatic brain injury [J].
DAmato, RC ;
Rothlisberg, BA .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 1996, 29 (06) :670-683