Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from a comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy

被引:21
作者
Maxwell, JG [1 ]
Robinson, CL
Maxwell, TG
Maxwell, BG
Smith, CR
Brinker, CC
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] New Hanover Reg Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New Hanover, NC USA
[3] Coastal Area Hlth Educ Ctr, Wilmington, NC 28402 USA
关键词
laparoscopic appendectomy; indications; gender differences; negative appendectomy rate; obesity;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00798-X
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Indications for laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) remain controversial and poorly defined. We sought to identify indications for LA through a comparison of LA and open appendectomies (OA). Methods: We reviewed demographics, coexisting medical conditions, radiology and pathology data, hospital course, and complications from charts on all LA patients and a comparison group of OA done from 1991 to 1998. Results: The following were significantly associated with LA: female sex, higher mean body mass index (BMI), coexisting medical problems, private insurance, and daytime surgery. The OA group was significantly more likely to have: a radiology report suggesting the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, perforation of the appendix, intensive care unit admission, and complications in their hospital course. Forty-one percent of the LA patients did not have appendicitis, compared with 20% of the OA patients. Conclusions: Daytime surgery, women, private insurance, coexisting medical problems, prior abdominal surgery, higher BMI, and less severe disease appear to be used by surgeons as indicators for LA. The threshold for surgical exploration appears to be lower for LA. (C) 2002 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 692
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
BUCKLEY RC, 1994, AM SURGEON, V60, P30
[2]   A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy [J].
Chung, RS ;
Rowland, DY ;
Li, P ;
Diaz, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) :250-256
[3]  
FERGUSON C, 1998, CURR SURG, V55, P287
[4]  
FRITTS LL, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P521
[5]  
Hart R, 1996, CAN J SURG, V39, P457
[6]   OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON [J].
MARTIN, LC ;
PUENTE, I ;
SOSA, JL ;
BASSIN, A ;
BRESLAW, R ;
MCKENNEY, MG ;
GINZBURG, E ;
SLEEMAN, D .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (03) :256-262
[7]  
MINNE L, 1997, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V132, P780
[8]   A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY WITH OPEN APPENDECTOMY [J].
ORTEGA, AE ;
HUNTER, JG ;
PETERS, JH ;
SWANSTROM, LL ;
SCHIRMER, B ;
SANGSTER, W ;
RATTNER, DW ;
FERGUSON, C ;
SOPER, N ;
PETELIN, J ;
UNGER, SW ;
APELGREN, KN ;
ARREGUI, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 169 (02) :208-213
[9]   Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: Prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination [J].
Rao, PM ;
Rhea, JT ;
Novelline, RA ;
McCabe, CJ ;
Lawrason, JN ;
Berger, DL ;
Sacknoff, R .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (01) :139-144
[10]  
SCHIRMER B, 1993, CURR SURG, V50, P466