Is China's River Chief Policy effective? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

被引:105
作者
She, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yaobin [1 ]
Jiang, Lei [1 ,3 ]
Yuan, Huaxi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Hangkong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang 330061, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
关键词
River chief policy; Water pollution; Yangtze river economic belt; Difference-in-difference; WATER-POLLUTION; SPILLOVERS; DECENTRALIZATION; CHALLENGES; BORDERS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China has introduced an innovative water management institution the River Chief Policy (RCP)-to manage water quality. Using the difference-in-difference (DID) method and panel data from 40 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt during the period from 2004 to 2015, we explore the effect of the RCP on surface water pollution. Our results first revealed that the RCP could substantially improve water quality. However, the effect of the RCP leveled off following its implementation. Second, the possible reasons why the RCP works well are industrial structure upgrades and the stringent policy measures to control industrial waste discharge. Third, we found that the effect of the RCP had heterogeneous impacts from city to city. More specifically, the RCP could reduce water pollutants more efficiently in cities with higher GDP levels and in cities with more rigorous environmental regulations. Finally, some policy implications for future versions of the RCP are presented. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 930
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools [J].
Altonji, JG ;
Elder, TE ;
Taber, CR .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2005, 113 (01) :151-184
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1963, AM BEHAV SCI, V6, P3
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Community-based fisheries management: Fisheries yields and sustainability, P1
[4]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[5]   Is there an environmental version of the Kantian peace? Insights from water pollution in Europe [J].
Bernauer, Thomas ;
Kuhn, Patrick M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2010, 16 (01) :77-102
[6]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[7]   Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: a political economy approach [J].
Besley, T ;
Coate, S .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2003, 87 (12) :2611-2637
[8]  
Bradford D.F., 2000, CONTRIB EC ANAL POLI, V4, P1073
[9]   The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China [J].
Chen, Zhao ;
Kahn, Matthew E. ;
Liu, Yu ;
Wang, Zhi .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 88 :468-485
[10]  
CROPPER M, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P250