Effects of molecular weight cutoff, f/k ratio (a hydrodynamic condition), and hydrophobic interactions on natural organic matter rejection and fouling in membranes

被引:18
作者
Cho, J [1 ]
Sohn, J
Choi, H
Kim, IS
Amy, G
机构
[1] Kwangju Inst Sci & Technol, ADEMRC, Gwangju 500712, South Korea
[2] Mininst Environm, Div Water Supply & Drinking Water Management, Kwacheon, South Korea
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA | 2002年 / 51卷 / 02期
关键词
f/k ratio; flux decline; nanofiltration; natural organic matter; ultrafiltration;
D O I
10.2166/aqua.2002.0009
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
All the possible mechanisms and factors affecting flux decline, natural organic matter (NOM) rejection, and NOM transport were studied in this paper. Electrostatic exclusion (charge repulsion) was determined to be an influential factor in minimizing flux decline and membrane fouling, and in maximizing NOM rejection; the effective MWCO (membrane molecular weight cutoff) concept was used to support the notion of electrostatic interactions and to describe all apparent MWCO by a charged membrane. This allowed for a negatively-charged tight ultrafiltration (UF) membrane to be comparatively compared to a nanofiltration (NF) membrane in terms of NOM rejection. The f/k ratio, relating relative back-diffusional transport to convective transport, was identified as a major influential factor in terms of flux decline and NOM rejection. The effect of hydrophobicity on flux decline was not significant when the same f/k ratio was used for different Nom-membrane pairs. The convectional and diffusional transportation of NOM was also evaluated for NF and UF membranes using existing thermodynamic models.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 123
页数:15
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
ALLGEIER SC, 1996, P 1996 AWWA WORKSH G
[2]   Interactions between natural organic matter (NOM) and membranes: Rejection and fouling [J].
Amy, G ;
Cho, J .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 40 (09) :131-139
[3]   Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes [J].
Cho, JW ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (11) :2517-2526
[4]   Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: comparison of flux decline, NOM rejection, and foulants during filtration with three UF membranes [J].
Cho, JW ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J .
DESALINATION, 2000, 127 (03) :283-298
[5]  
LAINE JM, 1989, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V81, P61
[6]  
Mulder M., 2012, BASIC PRINCIPLES MEM
[7]  
Nilson JA, 1996, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V88, P53
[8]   CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION WITH MEMBRANE ULTRAFILTRATION [J].
PORTER, MC .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1972, 11 (03) :234-&
[9]   MODELING OF PROTEIN TRANSMISSION THROUGH ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES [J].
TANDON, A ;
GUPTA, SK ;
AGARWAL, GP .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 97 :83-90
[10]  
WIESNER MR, 1992, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V84, P88