Differentially Expressed Genes during Flowering and Grain Filling in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Grown under Drought Stress Conditions

被引:23
|
作者
Mueller, Barbara Salomao de Faria [1 ,3 ]
Sakamoto, Tetsu [2 ]
Dias Silveira, Ricardo Diogenes [3 ]
Zambussi-Carvalho, Patricia Fernanda [4 ]
Pereira, Maristela [4 ]
Pappas, Georgios Joanis, Jr. [5 ]
do Carmo Costa, Marcos Mota [6 ]
Guimaraes, Cleber Moraes [7 ]
Pereira, Wendell Jacinto [3 ]
Brondani, Claudio [3 ]
Vianello-Brondani, Rosana Pereira [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Inst Biotechnol Appl Agr & Anim Sci BIOAGRO, Plant Mol Genet Lab, BR-36570000 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Inst Biol Sci, BioData Lab, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Embrapa Rice & Beans, Biotechnol Lab, BR-75375000 Santo Antonio De Goias, Go, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Goias, Inst Biol Sci, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Mol Biol Lab, BR-74001970 Goiania, Go, Brazil
[5] Univ Brasilia, Dept Cellular Biol, Mol Biol Lab, BR-70790160 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[6] Embrapa Genet Resources & Biotechnol, Bioinformat Lab, BR-70770901 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[7] Embrapa Rice & Beans, Agrophysiol Lab, BR-75375000 Santo Antonio De Goias, Go, Brazil
关键词
Legume crop; Abiotic stress; ESTs sequencing; Drought stress; ABIOTIC STRESS; RESPONSIVE GENES; SEQUENCE TAGS; PHYSIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; INTRINSIC PROTEIN; HIGH-SALINITY; FULL-LENGTH; IDENTIFICATION; RESISTANCE; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11105-013-0651-7
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Drought stress, particularly during the flowering and grain-filling stages of growth, contributes to serious yield loss in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The aim of this study was to identify genes induced in response to drought stress using transcriptome analysis of contrasting genotypes. Using leaf tissues of tolerant (BAT 477) and susceptible common bean genotypes (P,rola), collected at the flowering and grain-filling stages, four complementary deoxyribonucleic acid representational difference analysis subtractive libraries were constructed and then sequenced. A total of 7,203 (77.6 %) sequences with an average sequence size of 570 bp were considered valid, for a combined 4 Mbp sequence. According to a differential display analysis, 802 expressed sequence tags, distributed across 67 contigs, were differentially expressed by the tolerant (37 contigs) and susceptible genotypes (30 contigs) after identification under drought conditions during the two investigated plant developmental stages. Of these differential contigs, the 13 most frequent genes were exclusive to the tolerant genotype. Based on BLAST2GO, 73 % of the gene sequences were annotated and 12 % showed mapping results, with the highest similarity rate corresponding to Glycine max (41 %). According to gene ontology functional analysis, 48 % of the sequences were attributed to cell metabolic processes. Overall, 8.3 % of the transcribed sequences exhibited similarity to transcription factors, predominantly those of the AP2-EREBP family (97.8 %). Of the target sequences validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, most genes showed an expression level that agreed with that predicted by in silico analysis. Thus, the drought transcriptome dataset is a valuable resource on the variation in these gene sequences, offering the opportunity to identify robust molecular markers tightly linked to trait-controlling loci for use in marker-assisted breeding.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 451
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for drought stress adaptation in Ethiopia
    Darkwa, Kwabena
    Ambachew, Daniel
    Mohammed, Hussein
    Asfaw, Asrat
    Blair, Matthew W.
    CROP JOURNAL, 2016, 4 (05): : 367 - 376
  • [22] Identification of differentially expressed genes under drought stress in perennial ryegrass
    Liu, Shuwei
    Jiang, Yiwei
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2010, 139 (04) : 375 - 387
  • [23] Comparative study of enzymes related to proline metabolism in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under drought and irrigated conditions, and various urea concentrations
    M. Camacho Barrón
    E. González de Mejía
    Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 1998, 52 : 119 - 132
  • [24] Comparative study of enzymes related to proline metabolism in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under drought and irrigated conditions, and various urea concentrations
    Barron, MC
    De Mejia, EG
    PLANT FOODS FOR HUMAN NUTRITION, 1998, 52 (02) : 119 - 132
  • [25] Epigenetic Evaluation of Melatonin Application in Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes Under Drought and Salt Stress Conditions
    Aydinyurt, Recep
    Yagci, Semra
    Yaprak, Esra
    Kasapoglu, Ayse Guel
    Muslu, Selman
    Ucar, Sumeyra
    Aygoren, Ahmed Sidar
    Oner, Burak Muhammed
    Yigider, Esma
    Ilhan, Emre
    Aydin, Murat
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER, 2025,
  • [26] Nodulation and growth of nodules in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under salt stress.
    Saadallah, K
    Drevon, JJ
    Abdelly, C
    AGRONOMIE, 2001, 21 (6-7): : 627 - 634
  • [27] Breeding and cultivar improvement of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) for productivity and resilience under drought stress
    Sofkova, S.
    Topalova, E.
    Petkova, V.
    XXX INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, IHC2018- II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLANT BREEDING IN HORTICULTURE, 2020, 1282 : 399 - 406
  • [28] Morpho-Physiological responses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars to drought stress
    Kiymaz, Sultan
    Beyaz, Ramazan
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2019, 42 (04) : 505 - 511
  • [29] Impact of drought stress on physiological characteristics and isolation of chloroplasts in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Zadraznik, Tanja
    Sustar-Vozlic, Jelka
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2020, 43 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [30] Physiological and molecular analysis of the interaction between aluminium toxicity and drought stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
    Yang, Zhong-Bao
    Eticha, Dejene
    Albacete, Alfonso
    Madhusudana Rao, Idupulapati
    Roitsch, Thomas
    Horst, Walter Johannes
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2012, 63 (08) : 3109 - 3125