Factors that influence parents' assessments of the risks and benefits of research involving their children

被引:53
作者
Tait, AR [1 ]
Voepel-Lewis, T [1 ]
Malviya, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Anesthesiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
pediatric research; risks; benefits;
D O I
10.1542/peds.113.4.727
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective. The ability to assess accurately the risks and benefits of a study are important to ensure that the subject can make an informed decision regarding his or her own or his or her surrogate's participation. This study was designed to examine factors that influence parents' assessments of the risks and benefits of anesthesia and surgery research involving their children. Methods. The study population consisted of parents of 505 children who had been approached to participate in 1 of several ongoing clinical studies. Regardless of their decision to allow or decline their child's participation in a study, parents completed a questionnaire that elicited information regarding their perceptions of the risks and benefits of the study and factors that had influenced their decision. Results. Factors that influenced positive risk/benefit assessments by the parents included use of a placebo, the designated risk category of the study, the clarity of information given, the parents' perceptions of the amount of time provided to make a decision, and the amount of privacy afforded them in making a decision. Furthermore, positive risk/benefit assessments were associated with low decisional uncertainty and greater trust in the medical system. Conclusions. Identification of factors that influence parents' perceptions of the risks and benefits of a research study is important as a means to optimize the manner in which consent information is disclosed and to ensure that parents and subjects can assess accurately the relative importance of the risks and benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 732
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   THE NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 42 (01) :116-131
[2]   THE EFFICIENT ASSESSMENT OF NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE ;
KAO, CF .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1984, 48 (03) :306-307
[3]   RELIABILITY AND CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF 3 VISUAL-ANALOG MOOD SCALES [J].
CELLA, DF ;
PERRY, SW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1986, 59 (02) :827-833
[4]   Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research [J].
Corbie-Smith, G ;
Thomas, SB ;
Williams, MV ;
Moody-Ayers, S .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 14 (09) :537-546
[5]   Stability and change in personality assessment: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000 [J].
Costa, PT ;
McCrae, RR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1997, 68 (01) :86-94
[6]   Overview: Innovations in assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory [J].
Costa, PT ;
McCrae, RR .
ASSESSMENT, 2000, 7 (04) :325-327
[7]   Understanding self-rated health [J].
Fayers, PM ;
Sprangers, MAG .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9302) :187-188
[8]   A New Readability Yardstick [J].
Flesch, Rudolf .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1948, 32 (03) :221-233
[9]   RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND CLINICAL APPLICATION OF VISUAL ANALOG MOOD SCALE [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
LURIA, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1973, 3 (04) :479-486
[10]   ABSOLUTELY RELATIVE - HOW RESEARCH RESULTS ARE SUMMARIZED CAN AFFECT TREATMENT DECISIONS [J].
FORROW, L ;
TAYLOR, WC ;
ARNOLD, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 92 (02) :121-124