Is there no place like home? Caregivers recall reasons for and experience upon transfer from home hospice to inpatient facilities

被引:80
作者
Evans, Wendy G.
Cutson, Toni M.
Steinhaliser, Karen E.
Tulsky, James A.
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Palliat Care, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Ctr Study Aging & Human Dev, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Duke Hlth Community Care, Durham, NC USA
[5] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Serv Res Primary Care, Durham, NC USA
[6] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Geriatr Res Educ & Clin, Durham, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/jpm.2006.9.100
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To describe caregivers' reasons for transfer from home hospice to inpatient facilities, preferences for site of care and death, and their experiences during these transfers. Design: Retrospective qualitative analysis of interviews with caregivers of deceased hospice patients who had undergone transfer. Setting: A university-affiliated community hospice provider. Subjects: Caregivers of deceased hospice patients who transferred to an acute care hospital, a freestanding inpatient hospice facility, or a nursing home while enrolled in hospice and died between January 2003 and February 2004. Measurements: A semistructured interview protocol was developed and used for all interviews. Interviews were coded for reasons for transfer, preferences for site of care and death, and experience upon transfer using a grounded theory approach. Results: Patients transferred because of an acute medical event, an uncontrolled symptom, imminent death, or inability to provide needed care safely at home. Although all caregivers expressed a strong preference for care at home, other concerns such as pain and symptom control, safety, and quality and quantity of life became more important with time. We found significant variation in specific preferences regarding care and site of death. Satisfaction with care at the transfer facilities was determined by clarifying goals of care, following treatment preferences, providing personalized care, and the patient's environment. Conclusions: Hospice patients usually transfer to facilities to accomplish goals consistent with good end-of-life care. We can improve their experience by treating patients and their caregivers as unique individuals, exploring and respecting treatment preferences, and creating a pleasant physical environment.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 110
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, BASICS QUALITATIVE R
[2]   Families' perception of the added value of hospice in the nursing home [J].
Baer, WM ;
Hanson, LC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (08) :879-882
[3]   Family satisfaction with end-of-life care in seriously ill hospitalized adults [J].
Baker, R ;
Wu, AW ;
Teno, JM ;
Kreling, B ;
Damiano, AM ;
Rubin, HR ;
Roach, MJ ;
Wenger, NS ;
Phillips, RS ;
Desbiens, NA ;
Connors, AF ;
Knaus, W ;
Lynn, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (05) :S61-S69
[4]  
Bruera E, 1999, CAN MED ASSOC J, V161, P290
[5]   Predictors of home death in palliative care cancer patients [J].
Cantwell, P ;
Turco, S ;
Brenneis, C ;
Hanson, J ;
Neumann, CM ;
Bruera, E .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2000, 16 (01) :23-28
[6]  
Casarett D J, 2001, J Palliat Med, V4, P491, DOI 10.1089/109662101753381638
[7]   Surveys to assess satisfaction with end-of-life care: Does timing matter? [J].
Casarett, DJ ;
Crowley, R ;
Hirschman, KB .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 25 (02) :128-132
[8]  
Cintron Alexie, 2003, J Palliat Med, V6, P757, DOI 10.1089/109662103322515266
[9]   Effect of a palliative home care team on hospital admissions among patients with advanced cancer [J].
Costantini, M ;
Higginson, IJ ;
Boni, L ;
Orengo, MA ;
Garrone, E ;
Henriquet, F ;
Bruzzi, P .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 17 (04) :315-321
[10]   Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: Findings of the SUPPORT project [J].
Covinsky, KE ;
Fuller, JD ;
Yaffe, K ;
Johnston, CB ;
Hamel, MB ;
Lynn, J ;
Teno, JM ;
Phillips, RS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (05) :S187-S193