Effects of heterogeneous convergence rate on consensus in opinion dynamics

被引:30
作者
Huang, Changwei [1 ]
Dai, Qionglin [1 ]
Han, Wenchen [1 ]
Feng, Yuee [2 ]
Cheng, Hongyan [1 ]
Li, Haihong [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Sci, Beijing 100876, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Aviat Tech Coll, Coll Arts & Sci, Zhenjiang 212134, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Opinion dynamics; Bounded confidence; Heterogeneous convergence rate; BOUNDED CONFIDENCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.026
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The Deffuant model has attracted much attention in the study of opinion dynamics. Here, we propose a modified version by introducing into the model a heterogeneous convergence rate which is dependent on the opinion difference between interacting agents and a tunable parameter kappa. We study the effects of heterogeneous convergence rate on consensus by investigating the probability of complete consensus, the size of the largest opinion cluster, the number of opinion clusters, and the relaxation time. We find that the decrease of the convergence rate is favorable to decreasing the confidence threshold for the population to always reach complete consensus, and there exists optimal kappa resulting in the minimal bounded confidence threshold. Moreover, we find that there exists a window before the threshold of confidence in which complete consensus may be reached with a nonzero probability when kappa is not too large. We also find that, within a certain confidence range, decreasing the convergence rate will reduce the relaxation time, which is somewhat counterintuitive. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 435
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Effects of the Interaction Between Ideological Affinity and Psychological Reaction of Agents on the Opinion Dynamics in a Relative Agreement Model [J].
Abrica-Jacinto, Norma L. ;
Kurmyshev, Evguenii ;
Juarez, Hector A. .
JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2017, 20 (03)
[2]   Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman .
DYNAMIC GAMES AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 1 (01) :3-49
[3]   Dynamics of Opinion Forming in Structurally Balanced Social Networks [J].
Altafini, Claudio .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (06)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, J ARTIF SOC SOC SIMU
[5]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[6]   Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes [J].
Ben-Naim, E ;
Krapivsky, PL ;
Redner, S .
PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA, 2003, 183 (3-4) :190-204
[7]   Statistical physics of social dynamics [J].
Castellano, Claudio ;
Fortunato, Santo ;
Loreto, Vittorio .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81 (02) :591-646
[8]   Deffuant model on a ring with repelling mechanism and circular opinions [J].
Chen, Guodong ;
Cheng, Hongyan ;
Huang, Changwei ;
Han, Wenchen ;
Dai, Qionglin ;
Li, Haihong ;
Yang, Junzhong .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2017, 95 (04)
[9]  
CLIFFORD P, 1973, BIOMETRIKA, V60, P581, DOI 10.2307/2335008
[10]   Mixing beliefs among interacting agents [J].
Deffuant, G ;
Neau, D ;
Amblard, F ;
Weisbuch, G .
APPLICATIONS OF SIMULATION TO SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2000, :87-98