IPRO: An iterative computational protein library redesign and optimization procedure

被引:44
作者
Saraf, Manish C.
Moore, Gregory L.
Goodey, Nina M.
Cao, Vania Y.
Benkovic, Stephen J.
Maranas, Costas D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Chem Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Xencor Inc, Monrovia, CA 91016 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Chem, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1529/biophysj.105.079277
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
A number of computational approaches have been developed to reengineer promising chimeric proteins one at a time through targeted point mutations. In this article, we introduce the computational procedure IPRO (iterative protein redesign and optimization procedure) for the redesign of an entire combinatorial protein library in one step using energy-based scoring functions. IPRO relies on identifying mutations in the parental sequences, which when propagated downstream in the combinatorial library, improve the average quality of the library ( e. g., stability, binding affinity, specific activity, etc.). Residue and rotamer design choices are driven by a globally convergent mixed-integer linear programming formulation. Unlike many of the available computational approaches, the procedure allows for backbone movement as well as redocking of the associated ligands after a prespecified number of design iterations. IPRO can also be used, as a limiting case, for the redesign of a single or handful of individual sequences. The application of IPRO is highlighted through the redesign of a 16-member library of Escherichia coli/Bacillus subtilis dihydrofolate reductase hybrids, both individually and through upstream parental sequence redesign, for improving the average binding energy. Computational results demonstrate that it is indeed feasible to improve the overall library quality as exemplified by binding energy scores through targeted mutations in the parental sequences.
引用
收藏
页码:4167 / 4180
页数:14
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Computational design of receptors for an organophosphate surrogate of the nerve agent soman [J].
Allert, M ;
Rizk, SS ;
Looger, LL ;
Hellinga, HW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (21) :7907-7912
[2]  
Bacher JM, 2002, GENOME BIOL, V3
[3]   Significantly enhanced stability of glucose dehydrogenase by directed evolution [J].
Baik, SH ;
Ide, T ;
Yoshida, H ;
Kagami, O ;
Harayama, S .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 61 (04) :329-335
[4]  
Bateman A, 2004, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V32, pD138, DOI [10.1093/nar/gkp985, 10.1093/nar/gkr1065, 10.1093/nar/gkh121]
[5]  
Bates PA, 2001, PROTEINS, P39
[6]   A perspective on enzyme catalysis [J].
Benkovic, SJ ;
Hammes-Schiffer, S .
SCIENCE, 2003, 301 (5637) :1196-1202
[7]   Unnatural ligands for engineered proteins: New tools for chemical genetics [J].
Bishop, A ;
Buzko, O ;
Heyeck-Dumas, S ;
Jung, I ;
Kraybill, B ;
Liu, Y ;
Shah, K ;
Ulrich, S ;
Witucki, L ;
Yang, F ;
Zhang, C ;
Shokat, KM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS AND BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE, 2000, 29 :577-606
[8]   A hierarchical approach to protein molecular evolution [J].
Bogarad, LD ;
Deem, MW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (06) :2591-2595
[9]  
Bonneau R, 2001, PROTEINS, P119
[10]  
Brakmann S, 2001, CHEMBIOCHEM, V2, P865, DOI 10.1002/1439-7633(20011203)2:12<865::AID-CBIC865>3.0.CO