Efficacy comparison of transcervical video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy combined with left transthoracic esophagectomy versus right transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer treatment

被引:8
作者
Li, Xu [1 ]
Wang, Wenxiang [2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Yong [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Desong [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Jie [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Baihua [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Zhining [2 ,3 ]
Tang, Jinming [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Dept Thorac Surg, Xiangya Hosp 2, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Dept Thorac Surg 2, Hunan Canc Hosp, 283 Tongzipo St, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Cent S Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Xiangya Sch Med, 283 Tongzipo St, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 2018年 / 16卷
关键词
Esophageal carcinoma; Esophagectomy; Recurrent laryngeal nerve; Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; RESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL; RADICAL ESOPHAGECTOMY; METASTASIS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-017-1268-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to propose a new surgical strategy, i.e., the transcervical video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) with esophagectomy via the left transthoracic approach for patients with esophageal cancer (EC), and to compare the outcomes with those of esophagectomy via the right thoracic approach. Methods: From December 2014 to March 2016, 49 cases were enrolled in this non-randomized concurrent control study. Twenty-eight patients with EC who underwent transcervical VAMLA with esophagectomy via the left transthoracic approach were assigned into the study group, while 21 EC patients undergoing esophagectomy via the right transthoracic approach during the same period were enrolled into the control group. Operative outcomes including operative time, the numbers of removed lymph nodes, intraoperative blood loss, the length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications in both groups were evaluated and compared. Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline profiles between the two groups, and all patients in the two groups successfully underwent the surgery. There was a significant difference between transcervical VAMLA with esophagectomy via the left thoracic approach and esophagectomy via the right thoracic approach with regard to the number of all dissected lymph nodes [(29.0 +/- 8.7) vs. (17.8 +/- 8.1), p < 0.05], dissected superior mediastinal lymph nodes [(11.2 +/- 5.0) vs. (3.7 +/- 2.9), p < 0.05], and dissected in the recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes [(5.6 +/- 3.5) vs. (2.3 +/- 2.1), p < 0.05]. No significant differences were observed in the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay, number of dissected abdominal lymph nodes, postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia and atelectasis), anastomotic fistula, chylothorax, and vocal cord paralysis (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Transcervical VAMLA combined with esophagectomy via the left thoracic approach appears technically feasible and safe and shows advantages in the number of dissected superior mediastinal lymph nodes, suggesting that it may serve as a new treatment option for patients with esophageal carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Ainbinder DJ, 2009, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V133, P1256, DOI 10.1043/1543-2165-133.8.1256
  • [2] Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Barthel, James S.
    Bentrem, David J.
    D'Amico, Thomas A.
    Das, Prajnan
    Denlinger, Crystal S.
    Fuchs, Charles S.
    Gerdes, Hans
    Glasgow, Robert E.
    Hayman, James A.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Ilson, David H.
    Keswani, Rajesh N.
    Kleinberg, Lawrence R.
    Korn, Michael
    Lockhart, A. Craig
    Mulcahy, Mary F.
    Orringer, Mark B.
    Osarogiagbon, Raymond U.
    Posey, James A.
    Sasson, Aaron R.
    Scott, Walter J.
    Shibata, Stephen
    Strong, Vivian E. M.
    Varghese, Thomas K.
    Warren, Graham
    Washington, Mary Kay
    Willett, Christopher
    Wright, Cameron D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2011, 9 (08): : 830 - +
  • [3] Lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer
    Akutsu Y.
    Matsubara H.
    [J]. General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2013, 61 (7) : 397 - 401
  • [4] What is the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and adjuvant treatment in resectable esophageal cancer?
    Altorki, Nasser
    Harrison, Sebron
    [J]. ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 6 (02) : 167 - 174
  • [5] A Randomized Trial Comparing Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Versus Preoperative Chemotherapy for Localized Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus (JCOG9907)
    Ando, Nobutoshi
    Kato, Hoichi
    Igaki, Hiroyasu
    Shinoda, Masayuki
    Ozawa, Soji
    Shimizu, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Tsutomu
    Yabusaki, Hiroshi
    Aoyama, Norio
    Kurita, Akira
    Ikeda, Kenichiro
    Kanda, Tatsuo
    Tsujinaka, Toshimasa
    Nakamura, Kenichi
    Fukuda, Haruhiko
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (01) : 68 - 74
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, ELECT J DIFFERENTIAL, DOI DOI 10.1371/J0URNAL.P0NE.0106787
  • [7] International survey on esophageal cancer: part I surgical techniques
    Boone, Judith
    Livestro, Daan P.
    Elias, Sjoerd G.
    Rinkes, Inne H. M. Borel
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2009, 22 (03) : 195 - 202
  • [8] BUESS G, 1990, LANGENBECK ARCH CHIR, P1355
  • [9] Bumm R, 1997, WORLD J SURG, V21, P822
  • [10] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control study of thoracoscope versus mediastinoscope assistance
    Feng, Ming-Xiang
    Wang, Hao
    Zhang, Yi
    Tan, Li-Jie
    Xu, Zheng-Lang
    Qun, Wang
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1573 - 1578