Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland

被引:93
作者
MacQueen, Sarah [1 ]
Bradford, Ben [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Law, Scottish Ctr Crime & Justice Res, Edinburgh EH8 9LN, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Criminol, Oxford, England
关键词
Legitimacy; Procedural justice; Road policing; Trust; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; CITIZEN PERCEPTIONS; FIELD TRIAL; CONFIDENCE; SECURITY; IMPACT; LAW;
D O I
10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of 'procedurally just' policing on public trust and police legitimacy A block-randomised (matched pairs) design, with pretest and posttest measures, was implemented in the context of road policing in Scotland. Participants were drivers stopped by police in December and January 2013/14 as part of Police Scotland's 'Festive Road Safety Campaign'. The experimental intervention comprised a checklist of key messages to include in routine roadside vehicle stops, and a leaflet for officers to give to drivers. Analysis proceeds via random effects regression models predicting latent variable measures of trust, satisfaction and legitimacy Contrary to expectations, the intervention did not improve trust and legitimacy; rather, trust in the officers who made the stop, and satisfaction with their conduct, fell in the test sites, relative to the controls, after implementation of the intervention. The intervention had no significant effect on general trust in the police, nor on police legitimacy Results demonstrate the difficulty in translating experimental interventions across policing contexts, and challenge the notion that public perceptions may be improved through a simple, additive approach to the delivery and communication of procedural justice.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 443
页数:25
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SCOTT CRIM JUST SURV
[2]   Nonresponse Bias in Randomized Controlled Experiments in Criminology: Putting the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET) Under a Microscope [J].
Antrobus, Emma ;
Elffers, Henk ;
White, Gentry ;
Mazerolle, Lorraine .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 2013, 37 (3-4) :197-212
[3]  
Ariel B, 2010, HANDBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, P437, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7_21
[4]  
Boruch R, 2010, HANDBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, P481, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7_23
[5]  
Bradford B., 2014, BRIT J CRIMINOLOGY A
[6]   What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa [J].
Bradford, Ben ;
Huq, Aziz ;
Jackson, Jonathan ;
Roberts, Benjamin .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2014, 8 (02) :246-268
[7]   Contact and confidence: revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police [J].
Bradford, Ben ;
Jackson, Jonathan ;
Stanko, Elizabeth A. .
POLICING & SOCIETY, 2009, 19 (01) :20-46
[8]  
Brandl S., 1994, JUSTICE Q, V11, P119, DOI DOI 10.1080/0741882940009216110.1002/AJCP.12417
[9]   Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy [J].
Hinds, Lyn ;
Murphy, Kristina .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2007, 40 (01) :27-42
[10]   Influencing Trust and Confidence in the London Metropolitan Police [J].
Hohl, Katrin ;
Bradford, Ben ;
Stanko, Elizabeth A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2010, 50 (03) :491-513