Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and empirical antibiotic therapy for MRSA infection: multicenter investigation

被引:1
作者
Deng Li-jing [1 ]
Wu Xiao-dong [1 ]
Kang Yan [1 ]
Xu Yuan [2 ]
Zhou Jian-xin [3 ]
Wang Di-fen [4 ]
Chen De-chang [5 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Tongren Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing 10050, Peoples R China
[4] Guiyang Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Guiyang 550004, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Changzhen Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
关键词
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; empirical antibiotic therapy; epidemiology; mortality; ANTIMICROBIAL TREATMENT; IMPACT; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20131037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) maybe changed by strict infection control measures, and the impact of empirical antibiotic therapy on the outcomes of MRSA infection was not clear. We aimed to investigate the present epidemiological status of MRSA infection and empirical antibiotic therapy for MRSA infection in university teaching hospitals in mainland China. Methods The present study was a multicenter prospective observational study conducted in five university teaching hospitals. Patients who were consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit and signed a consent form from March 3, 2011 to May 31, 2011 were included. Patients with age <18 years or with a length of hospital stay <48 hours were excluded from this study. The following variables were collected or recorded: demographic data, general status, APACHE II score of the patient at the time of admission, infections, and the use of antibiotics during a stay. Primary outcomes and prognostic indicators included length of hospital stay and 28-day and 90-day mortality. The differences between the patients with appropriate empirical therapy and patients with inappropriate therapy were analyzed to detect the influences of antibiotic therapy on the prognosis of MRSA infection. Results A total of 682 cases were enrolled. Thirty (66.2%) of 88 MRSA cases were treated with effective antibiotics for MRSA infection; only 20% received appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment. The empirical therapy group compared with the target therapy group had a shorter length of stay, but there were no significant differences in mortality rates. There were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay, length of stay, and 28-day and 90-day mortality between MRSA-infected patients who received or not received effective antibiotics. Two hundred and eighteen cases received sensitive antibiotics for MRSA. Conclusions The MRSA infection rates are at relatively low levels in university teaching hospitals in China. The empirical use of sensitive antibiotics for MRSA infection was at relatively high rate, and there is a tendency of overusing in patients without MRSA infection. On the other hand, the rate of appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy for patients with MRSA infection is relatively low.
引用
收藏
页码:3745 / 3749
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating the role of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-specific antibiotic prophylaxis for neurosurgical patients
    Adapa, Arjun Rohit
    Linzey, Joseph Raynor
    Daou, Badih Junior
    Mehta, Unnati Vikram
    Patel, Twisha
    Ponnaluri-Wears, Sreelatha
    Washer, Laraine Lynn
    Thompson, B. Gregory
    Park, Paul
    Pandey, Aditya Swarup
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 200
  • [32] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection epidemiology and clinical response from tigecycline soft tissue infection trials
    Puzniak, Laura A.
    Quintana, Alvaro
    Wible, Michele
    Babinchak, Tim
    McGovern, Paul C.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2014, 79 (02) : 261 - 265
  • [33] Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in stethoscopes
    Diaz, CAG
    Kader, IA
    DAzevedo, P
    Becker, A
    Jurach, A
    Pescador, M
    REVISTA DE MICROBIOLOGIA, 1997, 28 (02): : 82 - 84
  • [34] Linezolid treatment of skeletal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection
    Isenberg J.
    Prokop A.
    Seifert H.
    Jubel A.
    European Journal of Trauma, 2004, 30 (6): : 387 - 393
  • [35] Long-term impact of molecular epidemiology shifts of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on severity and mortality of bloodstream infection
    Kaku, Norihito
    Ishige, Masaki
    Yasutake, Go
    Sasaki, Daisuke
    Ota, Kenji
    Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Fujiko
    Kosai, Kosuke
    Hasegawa, Hiroo
    Izumikawa, Koichi
    Mukae, Hiroshi
    Yanagihara, Katsunori
    EMERGING MICROBES & INFECTIONS, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [36] METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS LIP INFECTION MIMICKING ANGIOEDEMA
    Lucerna, Alan R.
    Espinosa, James
    Darlington, Anne M.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (01) : 8 - 11
  • [37] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lung infection in coronavirus disease 2019: how common?
    Bassetti, Matteo
    Magnasco, Laura
    Vena, Antonio
    Portunato, Federica
    Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto
    CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 35 (02) : 149 - 162
  • [38] National hospital infection surveillance on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Kobayashi, H
    DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 212 : 1 - 3
  • [39] EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSIS OF STRAINS OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS (MRSA) INFECTION IN THE NURSERY - PROGNOSIS OF MRSA CARRIER INFANTS
    MITSUDA, T
    ARAI, K
    FUJITA, S
    YOKOTA, S
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1995, 31 (02) : 123 - 134
  • [40] Is Intraarticular Antibiotic Administration Effective in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus?
    Kuyucu, E.
    Cabuk, H.
    Guler, Y.
    Cabuk, F.
    Kilic, E.
    Bulbul, M.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2019, 86 (04) : 276 - 280