Reassessing buried surface areas in protein-protein complexes

被引:29
作者
Chakravarty, Devlina [1 ]
Guharoy, Mainak [2 ]
Robert, Charles H. [2 ]
Chakrabarti, Pinak [1 ]
Janin, Joel [3 ]
机构
[1] Bose Inst, Dept Biochem, Kolkata 700054, India
[2] Univ Paris Diderot, CNRS, IBPC, Lab Biochim Theor,Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 11, CNRS, IBBMC, UMR 8619, F-91405 Orsay, France
关键词
protein-protein interaction; solvent accessible surface; conformation changes; binding free energy; RECOGNITION SITES; PRINCIPLES;
D O I
10.1002/pro.2330
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The buried surface area (BSA), which measures the size of the interface in a protein-protein complex may differ from the accessible surface area (ASA) lost upon association (which we call DSA), if conformation changes take place. To evaluate the DSA, we measure the ASA of the interface atoms in the bound and unbound states of the components of 144 protein-protein complexes taken from the Protein-Protein Interaction Affinity Database of Kastritis et al. (2011). We observe differences exceeding 20%, and a systematic bias in the distribution. On average, the ASA calculated in the bound state of the components is 3.3% greater than in their unbound state, and the BSA, 7% greater than the DSA. The bias is observed even in complexes where the conformation changes are small. An examination of the bound and unbound structures points to a possible origin: local movements optimize contacts with the other component at the cost of internal contacts, and presumably also the binding free energy.
引用
收藏
页码:1453 / 1457
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): ensuring a single, uniform archive of PDB data [J].
Berman, Helen ;
Henrick, Kim ;
Nakamura, Haruki ;
Markley, John L. .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2007, 35 :D301-D303
[2]   Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites [J].
Chakrabarti, P ;
Janin, J .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 47 (03) :334-343
[3]   PRINCIPLES OF PROTEIN-PROTEIN RECOGNITION [J].
CHOTHIA, C ;
JANIN, J .
NATURE, 1975, 256 (5520) :705-708
[4]  
Hubbard S., 1993, Computer Program, Department of Biochemistry Molecular Biology
[5]   Structures of glycoprotein Ibα and its complex with von Willebrand factor A1 domain [J].
Huizinga, EG ;
Tsuji, S ;
Romijn, RAP ;
Schiphorst, ME ;
de Groot, PG ;
Sixma, JJ ;
Gros, P .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5584) :1176-1179
[6]   Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0 [J].
Hwang, Howook ;
Vreven, Thom ;
Janin, Joel ;
Weng, Zhiping .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 78 (15) :3111-3114
[7]   Protein-protein interaction and quaternary structure [J].
Janin, Joel ;
Bahadur, Ranjit P. ;
Chakrabarti, Pinak .
QUARTERLY REVIEWS OF BIOPHYSICS, 2008, 41 (02) :133-180
[8]   Principles of protein-protein interactions [J].
Jones, S ;
Thornton, JM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (01) :13-20
[9]   A structure-based benchmark for protein-protein binding affinity [J].
Kastritis, Panagiotis L. ;
Moal, Iain H. ;
Hwang, Howook ;
Weng, Zhiping ;
Bates, Paul A. ;
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. ;
Janin, Joel .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (03) :482-491
[10]   Are Scoring Functions in Protein-Protein Docking Ready To Predict Interactomes? Clues from a Novel Binding Affinity Benchmark [J].
Kastritis, Panagiotis L. ;
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2010, 9 (05) :2216-2225