Visual search in divided areas: Dividers initially interfere with and later facilitate visual search

被引:9
作者
Nakashima, Ryoichi [1 ]
Yokosawa, Kazuhiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Humanities & Soc, Dept Psychol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Visual search; Efficient search; Inefficient search; Separated area; ATTENTIONAL FOCUS; SPATIAL ATTENTION; GLOBAL FEATURES; EYE-MOVEMENTS; GUIDANCE; TARGETS; CAPTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-012-0402-0
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A common search paradigm requires observers to search for a target among undivided spatial arrays of many items. Yet our visual environment is populated with items that are typically arranged within smaller (subdivided) spatial areas outlined by dividers (e.g., frames). It remains unclear how dividers impact visual search performance. In this study, we manipulated the presence and absence of frames and the number of frames subdividing search displays. Observers searched for a target O among Cs, a typically inefficient search task, and for a target C among Os, a typically efficient search. The results indicated that the presence of divider frames in a search display initially interferes with visual search tasks when targets are quickly detected (i.e., efficient search), leading to early interference; conversely, frames later facilitate visual search in tasks in which targets take longer to detect (i.e., inefficient search), leading to late facilitation. Such interference and facilitation appear only for conditions with a specific number of frames. Relative to previous studies of grouping (due to item proximity or similarity), these findings suggest that frame enclosures of multiple items may induce a grouping effect that influences search performance.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Reward and Attentional Control in Visual Search [J].
Yantis, Steven ;
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Wampler, Emma K. ;
Laurent, Patryk A. .
INFLUENCE OF ATTENTION, LEARNING, AND MOTIVATION ON VISUAL SEARCH, 2012, 59 :91-116
[22]   Visual Similarity Effects in Categorical Search [J].
Alexander, Robert G. ;
Zhang, Wei ;
Zelinsky, Gregory J. .
COGNITION IN FLUX, 2010, :1222-1227
[23]   Changing Perspective: Zooming In and Out During Visual Search [J].
Solman, Grayden J. F. ;
Cheyne, J. Allan ;
Smilek, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2013, 39 (02) :348-364
[24]   Saliency, attention, and visual search: An information theoretic approach [J].
Bruce, Neil D. B. ;
Tsotsos, John K. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (03)
[25]   Flicker is a Primitive Visual Attribute in Visual Search [J].
Spalek, Thomas M. ;
Kawahara, Jun-ichiro ;
Di Lollo, Vincent .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2009, 63 (04) :319-322
[26]   Visual search and visual discomfort [J].
O'Hare, Louise ;
Clarke, Alasdair D. ;
Hibbard, Paul B. .
PERCEPTION, 2013, 42 (01) :1-15
[27]   Visual search [J].
Chan, Louis K. H. ;
Hayward, William G. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2013, 4 (04) :415-429
[28]   Pre-Exposure of Repeated Search Configurations Facilitates Subsequent Contextual Cuing of Visual Search [J].
Beesley, Tom ;
Vadillo, Miguel A. ;
Pearson, Daniel ;
Shanks, David R. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2015, 41 (02) :348-362
[29]   Negative cues lead to more inefficient search than positive cues even at later stages of visual search [J].
Kawashima, Tomoya ;
Matsumoto, Eriko .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 190 :85-94
[30]   Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search [J].
Christian N. L. Olivers ;
Glyn W. Humphreys ;
Dietmar Heinke ;
Adam C. G. Cooper .
Perception & Psychophysics, 2002, 64 :540-560