Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study

被引:17
|
作者
Tsoi, Anna K. N. [1 ]
Ho, Leonard T. F. [2 ]
Wu, Irene X. Y. [3 ]
Wong, Charlene H. L. [1 ]
Ho, Robin S. T. [1 ]
Lim, Joanne Y. Y. [1 ]
Mao, Chen [4 ]
Lee, Eric K. P. [1 ]
Chung, Vincent C. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Jockey Club Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Sch Chinese Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Sch Publ Hlth, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Southern Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; Osteoporosis; Evidence-based practice; Research design; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; METAANALYSES; RELIABILITY; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bone.2020.115541
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Systematic reviews (SRs) provide the best evidence on the effectiveness of treatment strategies for osteoporosis. Carefully conducted SRs provide high-quality evidence for supporting decision-making, but the trustworthiness of conclusions can be hampered by limitation in rigor. We aimed to appraise the methodological quality of a representative sample of SRs on osteoporosis treatments in a cross-sectional study. Methods: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched for SRs on osteoporotic treatments. AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) 2 was used to evaluate methodological quality of SRs. Associations between bibliographical characteristics and methodological quality ratings were explored using multivariate regression analyses. Results: A total of 101 SRs were appraised. Overall, one (1.0%) was rated "high quality", three (3.0%) were rated "moderate quality", eleven (10.9%) were rated "low quality", and eighty-six (85.1%) were rated "critically low quality". Ninety-nine (98.0%) did not explain study design selection, eighty-five (84.2%) did not provide a list of excluded studies (84.2%), and eighty-five (84.2%) did not report funding sources of included studies. SRs published in 2018 or after were associated with higher overall quality [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 5.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-26.89], while SRs focused on pharmacological interventions were associated with lower overall quality [AOR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.06-0.96]. Conclusion: The methodological quality of the included SRs is far from satisfactory. Future reviewers must strengthen rigor by improving literature search comprehensiveness, registering and publishing a priori protocols, and optimising study selection and data extraction. Better transparency in reporting conflicts of interest among reviewers, as well as sources of funding among included primary studies, are also needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identifying competing interest disclosures in systematic reviews of surgical interventions and devices: a cross-sectional survey
    Yu, Jiajie
    Su, Guanyue
    Hirst, Allison
    Yang, Zhengyue
    Zhang, You
    Li, Youping
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [32] Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study
    Eleanor A Ochodo
    Wynanda A van Enst
    Christiana A Naaktgeboren
    Joris AH de Groot
    Lotty Hooft
    Karel GM Moons
    Johannes B Reitsma
    Patrick M Bossuyt
    Mariska MG Leeflang
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14
  • [33] Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study
    Ochodo, Eleanor A.
    van Enst, Wynanda A.
    Naaktgeboren, Christiana A.
    de Groot, Joris A. H.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Leeflang, Mariska M. G.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [34] Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study
    Goossen, Kaethe
    Hess, Simone
    Lunny, Carole
    Pieper, Dawid
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [35] Association between hypertension and osteoporosis: a population-based cross-sectional study
    Huang, Yuqing
    Ye, Jianya
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [36] Prevalence and methodological quality of systematic reviews in Korean medical journals
    Kim, Seong Jung
    Han, Mi Ah
    Jung, Jae Hung
    Hwang, Eu Chang
    Kim, Hae Ran
    Yoon, Sang Eun
    Kim, Seo-Hee
    Kim, Pius
    Kim, So-Yeong
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH, 2023, 45 : 1 - 6
  • [37] The methodological quality of robotic surgical meta-analyses needed to be improved: a cross-sectional study
    Yan, Peijing
    Yao, Liang
    Li, Huijuan
    Zhang, Min
    Xun, Yangqin
    Li, Meixuan
    Cai, Hui
    Lu, Cuncun
    Hu, Lidong
    Guo, Tiankang
    Liu, Rong
    Yang, Kehu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 109 : 20 - 29
  • [38] Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis
    Nicolau, I.
    Ling, D.
    Tian, L.
    Lienhardt, C.
    Pai, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2013, 17 (09) : 1160 - 1169
  • [39] Overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional analysis using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool
    Almeida, Matheus Oliveira
    Yamato, Tie Parma
    Silva Parreira, Patricia do Carma
    Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira
    Kamper, Steven
    Saragiotto, Bruno Tirotti
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2020, 24 (02) : 103 - 117
  • [40] Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Orthodontic Interventions: Methodological Study
    Notaro, Sarah Queiroz
    Hermont, Ana Paula
    Cruz, Poliana Valdelice
    Maia, Raiane Machado
    Avila, Walesca Melo
    Pericic, Tina Poklepovic
    Abreu, Lucas Guimaraes
    Jiao, Ruimin
    Martins-Pfeifer, Carolina Castro
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2024, 24