Landscape-level comparison of genetic diversity and differentiation in a small mammal inhabiting different fragmented landscapes of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

被引:33
作者
Balkenhol, Niko [1 ,2 ]
Pardini, Renata [3 ]
Cornelius, Cintia [4 ]
Fernandes, Fabiano [1 ,3 ]
Sommer, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Zoo & Wildlife Res IZW, D-10324 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Forest Zool & Forest Conservat, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Biociencias, Dept Zool, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Biociencias, Dept Ecol, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Landscape genetics; Landscape connectivity; Meta-population; Model selection; Patch metrics; Marsupial; Marmosops incanus; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; CONNECTIVITY MEASURES; MICROSATELLITE LOCI; POPULATION; THRESHOLDS; G(ST); FLOW; OPOSSUM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10592-013-0454-2
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Habitat loss and fragmentation can have detrimental effects on all levels of biodiversity, including genetic variation. Most studies that investigate genetic effects of habitat loss and fragmentation focus on analysing genetic data from a single landscape. However, our understanding of habitat loss effects on landscape-wide patterns of biodiversity would benefit from studies that are based on quantitative comparisons among multiple study landscapes. Here, we use such a landscape-level study design to compare genetic variation in the forest-specialist marsupial Marmosops incanus from four 10,000-hectare Atlantic forest landscapes which differ in the amount of their remaining native forest cover (86, 49, 31, 11 %). Additionally, we used a model selection framework to evaluate the influence of patch characteristics on genetic variation within each landscape. We genotyped 529 individuals with 12 microsatellites to statistically compare estimates of genetic diversity and genetic differentiation in populations inhabiting different forest patches within the landscapes. Our study indicates that before the extinction of the specialist species (here in the 11 % landscape) genetic diversity is significantly reduced in the 31 % landscape, while genetic differentiation is significantly higher in the 49 and 31 % landscapes compared to the 86 % landscape. Results further provide evidence for non-proportional responses of genetic diversity and differentiation to increasing habitat loss, and suggest that local patch isolation impacts gene flow and genetic connectivity only in the 31 % landscape. These results have high relevance for analysing landscape genetic relationships and emphasize the importance of landscape-level study designs for understanding habitat loss effects on all levels of biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 367
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Akaike H., 1973, 2 INT S INFORM THEOR, P267
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach
  • [5] Bailie J, 2004, IUCN RED LIST THREAT
  • [6] A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics
    Calabrese, JM
    Fagan, WF
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 2 (10) : 529 - 536
  • [7] smogd: software for the measurement of genetic diversity
    Crawford, Nicholas G.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2010, 10 (03) : 556 - 557
  • [8] Gene flow in complex landscapes: Testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling
    Cushman, Samuel A.
    McKelvey, Kevin S.
    Hayden, Jim
    Schwartz, Michael K.
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2006, 168 (04) : 486 - 499
  • [9] Characterization of eight microsatellite loci in the woolly mouse opossum, Micoureus paraguayanus, isolated from Micoureus demerarae
    Dias, I. M. G.
    Amato, G.
    Carvalho, M. R. S.
    Cunha, H. M.
    Paglia, A. P.
    Desalle, R.
    Fonseca, C. G.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2008, 8 (02) : 345 - 347
  • [10] MICROSATELLITE ANALYSER (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets
    Dieringer, D
    Schlotterer, C
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2003, 3 (01): : 167 - 169