If we can do it for misoprostol, why not for mifepristone? The case for taking mifepristone out of the office in medical abortion

被引:18
作者
Gold, Marji [1 ]
Chong, Erica [2 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10458 USA
[2] Gynu Hlth Projects, New York, NY 10010 USA
关键词
HOME-USE; ACCEPTABILITY; TELEMEDICINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Given the highly political nature of abortion in the United States, the provision of medical abortion with mifepristone (Mifeprex (R)) and misoprostol has always occurred under a unique set of circumstances. The Food and Drug Administration-approved regimen requires clinicians to administer the mifepristone in the office and also requires women to return to the office for the misoprostol. In the US, where off-label drug use is an accepted practice when supportive evidence exists, most clinicians give women the misoprostol at the initial visit for her to take at home, eliminating an unnecessary visit to the office. This commentary suggests that, based on current studies, there is also enough evidence to offer women the option to self-administer mifepristone out of the office and that this is just another feature of off-label use. Six studies, enrolling over 1800 women, found that the option of taking mifepristone out of the office was popular and acceptable among women and providers. Given that it is safe, highly acceptable and not burdensome on providers, outside-office-use of mifepristone should be offered to all women as part of routine medical abortion services. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 196
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, OBSTET GYNECOL, V123, P676, DOI DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444454.67279.7d
[2]  
Chong E, 2015, CONTRACEPTION
[3]   A prospective open-label study of home use of mifepristone for medical abortion in Nepal [J].
Conkling, Kathryn ;
Karld, Chanda ;
Tuladhar, Heera ;
Bracken, Hillary ;
Winikoff, Beverly .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 128 (03) :220-223
[4]   A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion [J].
Creinin, MD ;
Fox, MC ;
Teal, S ;
Chen, A ;
Schaff, EA ;
Meyn, LA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (05) :851-859
[5]   Mifepristone and misoprostol administered simultaneously versus 24 hours apart for abortion - A Randomized controlled trial [J].
Creinin, Mitchell D. ;
Schreiber, Courtney A. ;
Bednarek, Paula ;
Lintu, Hanna ;
Wagner, Marie-Soleil ;
Meyn, Leslie A. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04) :885-894
[6]   Using telemedicine for termination of pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol in settings where there is no access to safe services [J].
Gomperts, R. J. ;
Jelinska, K. ;
Davies, S. ;
Gemzell-Danielsson, K. ;
Kleiverda, G. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (09) :1171-1175
[7]   METHOTREXATE AND MISOPROSTOL TO TERMINATE EARLY-PREGNANCY [J].
HAUSKNECHT, RU .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (09) :537-540
[8]   The introduction of first trimester medical abortion in Armenia [J].
Louie, Karmen S. ;
Chong, Erica ;
Tsereteli, Tamar ;
Avagyan, Gayane ;
Vardanyan, Susanna ;
Winikoff, Beverly .
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2015, 22 (44) :56-66
[9]   Acceptability and feasibility of mifepristone medical abortion in the early first trimester in Azerbaijan [J].
Louie, Karmen S. ;
Tsereteli, Tamar ;
Chong, Erica ;
Aliyeva, Faiza ;
Rzayeva, Gulnara ;
Winikoff, Beverly .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2014, 19 (06) :457-464
[10]  
National Abortion Federation (NAF), 2015, 2015 CLIN POL GUID