The Powerful Impact of Double-Layered Posterior Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:16
作者
Gondo, Tatsuo [1 ]
Yoshioka, Kunihiko [1 ]
Hashimoto, Takeshi [1 ]
Nakagami, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Hamada, Riu [1 ]
Kashima, Takeshi [1 ]
Shimodaira, Kenji [1 ]
Takeuchi, Hisashi [1 ]
Satake, Naoya [1 ]
Tachibana, Masaaki [1 ]
Rocco, Bernardo [2 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1600023, Japan
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Surg Sci, Specialist Sect Urol, Milan, Italy
关键词
BLADDER NECK PRESERVATION; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; ANASTOMOSIS;
D O I
10.1089/end.2012.0067
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: The usefulness of posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction (PR) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has still been controversial. We investigated the association of several factors, including the Rocco original double-layered PR, with early recovery of urinary continence after RARP. Patients and Methods: Between August 2006 and April 2011, a single surgeon at Tokyo Medical University Hospital performed 206 RARPs. Of these 206 patients, 199 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively analyzed the correlation of several perioperative factors, including surgical techniques, with early recovery of urinary continence 1 month after catheter removal. Continence was defined as no use or the use of only one safety pad. Results: Univariate analysis showed that surgeon experience, lateral approach of bladder neck preservation, bladder neck reconstruction, anterior reconstruction, and the Rocco double-layered PR were significantly associated with early recovery of urinary continence 1 month after catheter removal. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, body mass index, and attempted nerve-sparing (NS) procedures, however, were not significantly associated with early recovery of urinary continence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the Rocco PR and attempted NS were the only independent predictive factors of urinary continence recovery 1 month after catheter removal (odds ratio [OR], 15.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.413-66.67; P = 0.0003 and OR, 2.248; 95% CI, 1.048-4.975; P = 0.0402, respectively). When we applied NS as well as the Rocco PR, the recovery rates of continence at 1 month after catheter removal was 85.3%. Conclusions: The Rocco double-layered PR and attempted NS and not surgeon experience were the significant independent predictive factors of early recovery of urinary continence after RARP. NS procedures positively influenced early recovery of urinary continence only when they were applied with the PR technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1159 / 1164
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
BRASLIS KG, 1995, EUR UROL, V28, P202
[2]   Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy - Does it have an impact on urinary continence? [J].
Burkhard, Fiona C. ;
Kessler, Thomas M. ;
Fleischmann, Achim ;
Thalmann, George N. ;
Schumacher, Martin ;
Studer, Urs E. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (01) :189-195
[3]   Influence of Modified Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter on Early Recovery of Continence and Anastomotic Leakage Rates after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Coelho, Rafael F. ;
Chauhan, Sanket ;
Orvieto, Marcelo A. ;
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan ;
Palmer, Kenneth J. ;
Coughlin, Geoff ;
Patel, Vipul R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) :72-80
[4]   Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes [J].
Coelho, Rafael F. ;
Chauhan, Sanket ;
Palmer, Kenneth J. ;
Rocco, Bernardo ;
Patel, Manoj B. ;
Patel, Vipul R. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (10) :1428-1435
[5]   Athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Coughlin G. ;
Dangle P.P. ;
Palmer K.J. ;
Samevedi S. ;
Patel V.R. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2009, 3 (1) :13-17
[6]   Radical prostatectomy: Bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing - Effects on continence and positive margins [J].
Deliveliotis, C ;
Protogerou, V ;
Alargof, E ;
Varkarakis, J .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (05) :855-858
[7]   Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Galfano, Antonio ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand ;
Menon, Mani ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Patel, Vipul ;
Rassweiler, Jens ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) :1037-1063
[8]   Anatomic Bladder Neck Preservation During Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Description of Technique and Outcomes [J].
Freire, Marcos P. ;
Weinberg, Aaron C. ;
Lei, Yin ;
Soukup, Jane R. ;
Lipsitz, Stuart R. ;
Prasad, Sandip M. ;
Korkes, Fernando ;
Lin, Tiffany ;
Hu, Jim C. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (06) :972-980
[9]   Posterior Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Critical Analysis of Techniques and Outcomes [J].
Gautam, Gagan ;
Rocco, Bernardo ;
Patel, Vipul R. ;
Zorn, Kevin C. .
UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (03) :734-741
[10]   Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy - The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience [J].
Han, M ;
Partin, AW ;
Pound, CR ;
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (03) :555-+