Intercomparison of SO2 camera systems for imaging volcanic gas plumes

被引:38
作者
Kern, Christoph [1 ]
Luebcke, Peter [2 ]
Bobrowski, Nicole [2 ]
Campion, Robin [3 ]
Mori, Toshiya [4 ]
Smekens, Jean-Francois [5 ]
Stebel, Kerstin [6 ]
Tamburello, Giancarlo [7 ]
Burton, Mike [8 ]
Platt, Ulrich [2 ]
Prata, Fred [6 ]
机构
[1] USGS Cascades Volcano Observ, Vancouver, WA 98683 USA
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Environm Phys, INF 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Geofis, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[4] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Sci, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[5] Arizona State Univ, Sch Earth & Space Explorat, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[6] Norwegian Inst Air Res, Climate & Atmosphere Dept, N-2007 Metier, Norway
[7] Univ Palermo, Dipartimento Sci Terra & Mare, I-90123 Palermo, Italy
[8] Ist Nazl Geofis & Vulcanol, I-56122 Pisa, Italy
关键词
SO2; Camera; Volcanic gas emissions; Sulfur dioxide; Ultraviolet spectroscopy; Instrument intercomparison; Remote sensing; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.08.026
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
SO2 camera systems are increasingly being used to image volcanic gas plumes. The ability to derive SO2 emission rates directly from the acquired imagery at high time resolution allows volcanic process studies that incorporate other high time-resolution datasets. Though the general principles behind the SO2 camera have remained the same for a number of years, recent advances in CCD technology and an improved understanding of the physics behind the measurements have driven a continuous evolution of the camera systems. Here we present an intercomparison of seven different SO2 cameras. In the first part of the experiment, the various technical designs are compared and the advantages and drawbacks of individual design options are considered. Though the ideal design was found to be dependent on the specific application, a number of general recommendations are made. Next, a time series of images recorded by all instruments at Stromboli Volcano (Italy) is compared. All instruments were easily able to capture SO2 clouds emitted from the summit vents. Quantitative comparison of the SO2 load in an individual cloud yielded an intra-instrument precision of about 12%. From the imagery, emission rates were then derived according to each group's standard retrieval process. A daily average SO2 emission rate of 61 +/- 10 t/d was calculated. Due to differences in spatial integration methods and plume velocity determination, the time-dependent progression of SO2 emissions varied significantly among the individual systems. However, integration over distinct degassing events yielded comparable SO2 masses. Based on the intercomparison data, we find an approximate 1-sigma precision of 20% for the emission rates derived from the various SO2 cameras. Though it may still be improved in the future, this is currently within the typical accuracy of the measurement and is considered sufficient for most applications. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 36
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Development of an ultra-violet digital camera for volcanic SO2 imaging
    Bluth, G. J. S.
    Shannon, J. M.
    Watson, I. M.
    Prata, A. J.
    Realmuto, V. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2007, 161 (1-2) : 47 - 56
  • [2] Image-based correction of the light dilution effect for SO2 camera measurements
    Campion, Robin
    Delgado-Granados, Hugo
    Mori, Toshiya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2015, 300 : 48 - 57
  • [3] Assessment of the UV camera sulfur dioxide retrieval for point source plumes
    Dalton, Marika P.
    Watson, I. Matthew
    Nadeau, Patricia A.
    Werner, Cynthia
    Morrow, William
    Shannon, Jeremy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2009, 188 (04) : 358 - 366
  • [4] A miniaturised ultraviolet spectrometer for remote sensing of SO2 fluxes:: a new tool for volcano surveillance
    Galle, B
    Oppenheimer, C
    Geyer, A
    McGonigle, AJS
    Edmonds, M
    Horrocks, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2003, 119 (1-4) : 241 - 254
  • [5] Horton K.A., 2012, HAW VOL SOURC SURF C
  • [6] Protocols for UV camera volcanic SO2 measurements
    Kantzas, Euripides P.
    McGonigle, A. J. S.
    Tamburello, Giancarlo
    Aiuppa, Alessandro
    Bryant, Robert G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2010, 194 (1-3) : 55 - 60
  • [7] Relation between single very-long-period pulses and volcanic gas emissions at Mt. Asama, Japan
    Kazahaya, Ryunosuke
    Mori, Toshiya
    Takeo, Minoru
    Ohminato, Takao
    Urabe, Taku
    Maeda, Yuta
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 38
  • [8] Theoretical description of functionality, applications, and limitations of SO2 cameras for the remote sensing of volcanic plumes
    Kern, C.
    Kick, F.
    Luebeck, P.
    Vogel, L.
    Woehrbach, M.
    Platt, U.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2010, 3 (03) : 733 - 749
  • [9] An automated SO2 camera system for continuous, real-time monitoring of gas emissions from Kilauea Volcano's summit Overlook Crater
    Kern, Christoph
    Sutton, Jeff
    Elias, Tamar
    Lee, Lopaka
    Kamibayashi, Kevan
    Antolik, Loren
    Werner, Cynthia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2015, 300 : 81 - 94
  • [10] Applying UV cameras for SO2 detection to distant or optically thick volcanic plumes
    Kern, Christoph
    Werner, Cynthia
    Elias, Tamar
    Sutton, A. Jeff
    Luebcke, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2013, 262 : 80 - 89