CAN HOUSEHOLDS AND WELFARE STATES MITIGATE RISING EARNINGS INSTABILITY?

被引:15
作者
Bartels, Charlotte [1 ]
Boenke, Timm [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Econ, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
earnings dynamics; earnings inequality; permanent income inequality; safety net; transfer payments; transitory income volatility; UNITED-STATES; INCOME-DISTRIBUTION; WAGE INEQUALITY; TRANSITORY; GERMANY; DYNAMICS; MOBILITY; TRENDS; INFERENCE; CANADA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00497.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We compare the evolution of earnings instability in Germany and the United Kingdom, two countries which stand for different types of welfare states. Deploying data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) and the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS), we estimate permanent and transitory variances of male income over the period 19842009 and 19912006, respectively. Studies in this literature generally use individual labor earnings. To uncover the role of welfare state and households in smoothening earnings shocks, we compute different income concepts ranging from gross earnings to net equivalent household income. We find evidence that the overall inequality of earnings in Germany and the United Kingdom has been rising throughout the period due to both higher permanent earnings inequality and higher earnings volatility. However, taking institutions of the welfare state and risk-sharing households into account, we find that the volatility of net household income has remained fairly stable. Furthermore, redistribution and risk insurance provided by the welfare state is more pronounced in Germany than in the United Kingdom.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 282
页数:33
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Trends in US wage inequality: Revising the revisionists [J].
Autor, David H. ;
Katz, Lawrence F. ;
Kearney, Melissa S. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 90 (02) :300-323
[2]   FROM BOTTOM TO TOP: THE ENTIRE INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN GERMANY, 1992-2003 [J].
Bach, Stefan ;
Corneo, Giacomo ;
Steiner, Viktor .
REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2009, 55 (02) :303-330
[3]   Earnings dynamics and inequality among Canadian men, 1976-1992: Evidence from longitudinal income tax records [J].
Baker, M ;
Solon, G .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2003, 21 (02) :289-321
[4]  
Barr N., 1998, EC WELFARE STATE, V3rd
[5]   LONG-RUN INEQUALITY AND SHORT-RUN INSTABILITY OF MEN'S AND WOMEN'S EARNINGS IN CANADA [J].
Beach, Charles M. ;
Finnie, Ross ;
Gray, David .
REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2010, 56 (03) :572-596
[6]   Bootstrap inference for inequality, mobility and poverty measurement [J].
Biewen, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2002, 108 (02) :317-342
[7]  
Biewen M., 2001, ALLGEMEINES STAT ARC, V85, P409
[8]  
Biewen Martin., 2005, German Economic Review, V6, P445, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-0475.2005.00141.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0475.2005.00141.X]
[9]   Consumption inequality and income uncertainty [J].
Blundell, R ;
Preston, I .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (02) :603-640
[10]  
Bougheas S., 2004, Labour, V18, P233, DOI 10.1111/j.1121-7081.2004.00266.x