Technologies that affect the weaning rate in beef cattle production systems

被引:11
作者
Dill, Matheus Dhein [1 ,2 ]
Pereira, Gabriel Ribas [3 ]
Goncalves Costa, Joao Batista, Jr. [3 ]
Canellas, Leonardo Canali [3 ]
Peripolli, Vanessa [4 ]
Braccini Neto, Jose [3 ]
Sant'Anna, Danilo Menezes [5 ]
McManus, Concepta [4 ]
Jardim Barcellos, Julio Otavio [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Nucleo Estudos Sistemas Prod Bovinos Corte & Cade, Ctr Studies & Res Agribusiness CEPAN, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rural Pernambuco, Unidade Acad Garanhuns, BR-55292270 Garanhuns, PE, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Agron, Dept Anim Sci, Nucleo Estudos Sistemas Prod Bovinos Corte & Cade, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Brasilia, Fac Agron & Vet Med, BR-70910900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[5] Embrapa Pecuaria Sul, Empresa Brasileira Pesquisa Agr, BR-96401970 Bage, RS, Brazil
关键词
Livestock; Beef cattle production; Technology adoption; Management; GRANDE-DO-SUL; REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVENESS; EFFICIENCY; COW;
D O I
10.1007/s11250-015-0856-x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
We investigated the differences between weaning rates and technologies adopted by farmers in cow-calf production systems in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Interviews were carried out with 73 farmers about 48 technologies that could affect reproductive performance. Data were analyzed by multivariate analysis using a non-hierarchical cluster method. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Three distinct clusters of farmers were created (R (2) = 0.90), named as low (LWR), intermediate (IWR), and high (HWR) weaning rate, with 100, 91, and 96 % of the farmers identified within their respective groups and average weaning rates of 59, 72, and 83 %, respectively. IWR and HWR farmers used more improved natural pasture, fixed-time artificial insemination, selection for birth weight, and proteinated salt compared to LWR. HWR farmers used more stocking rate control, and IWR farmers used more ultrasound to evaluate reproductive performance compared to the LWR group. IWR and HWR adopted more technologies related to nutrition and reproductive aspects of the herd in comparison to LWR. We concluded that farmers with higher technology use on farm had higher weaning rates which could be used to benefit less efficient farmers.
引用
收藏
页码:1255 / 1260
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ABIEC, 2014, BRAZ BEEF PROF 2012
[2]   Multivariate analysis that can be used to determine of dairy producers homogeneous groups [J].
Aleixo, Sany Spinola ;
de Souza, Jose Gilberto ;
Ferraudo, Antonio Sergio .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 36 (06) :2168-2175
[3]  
Anderson D., 2003, Essentials of Statistics for Business and Economics, V3rd
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Censo Agropecuario 2006
[5]  
ANUALPEC, 2012, ANUALPEC AN PEC BRAS
[6]  
Baruselli PS, 2012, ANIM REPROD, V9, P139
[7]   Understanding farmers' intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the theory of planned behavior [J].
Borges, Joao Augusto Rossi ;
Oude Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. ;
Ribeiro, Claudio Marques ;
Lutke, Vanessa .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2014, 169 :163-174
[8]   Adaptive management of stocking rates to reduce effects of drought on cow-calf production systems in semi-arid rangelands [J].
Diaz-Solis, H. ;
Grant, W. E. ;
Kothmann, M. M. ;
Teague, W. R. ;
Diaz-Garcia, J. A. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2009, 100 (1-3) :43-50
[9]  
Dill Matheus Dhein, 2013, Rev. Ceres, V60, P765, DOI 10.1590/S0034-737X2013000600004
[10]   Optimising reproductive performance of beef cows and replacement heifers [J].
Diskin, M. G. ;
Kenny, D. A. .
ANIMAL, 2014, 8 :27-39