An Investigation of the Alignment Method With Polytomous Indicators Under Conditions of Partial Measurement Invariance

被引:50
作者
Flake, Jessica K. [1 ]
McCoach, D. Betsy [2 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT USA
关键词
alignment method; factor analysis; partial measurement invariance; polytomous indicators; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; COVARIANCE; TESTS; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/10705511.2017.1374187
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The alignment method (Asparouhov & Muthen, 2014) is an alternative to multiple-group factor analysis for estimating measurement models and testing for measurement invariance across groups. Simulation studies evaluating the performance of the alignment for estimating measurement models across groups show promising results for continuous indicators. This simulation study builds on previous research by investigating the performance of the alignment method's measurement models estimates with polytomous indicators under conditions of systematically increasing, partial measurement invariance. We also present an evaluation of the testing procedure, which has not been the focus of previous simulation studies. Results indicate that the alignment adequately recovers parameter estimates under small and moderate amounts of noninvariance, with issues only arising in extreme conditions. In addition, the statistical tests of invariance were fairly conservative, and had less power for items with more extreme skew. We include recommendations for using the alignment method based on these results.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 70
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, A first course in structural equation modeling
[2]  
[Anonymous], MPLUS WEB NOTES
[3]  
Asparouhov T., 2014, MULTIPLE GROUP ALIGN
[4]   Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-Step Approaches Using Mplus [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (03) :329-341
[5]   TESTING FOR THE EQUIVALENCE OF FACTOR COVARIANCE AND MEAN STRUCTURES - THE ISSUE OF PARTIAL MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE [J].
BYRNE, BM ;
SHAVELSON, RJ ;
MUTHEN, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (03) :456-466
[6]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255
[7]   An investigation of the likelihood ratio test for detection of differential item functioning [J].
Cohen, AS ;
Kim, SH ;
Wollack, JA .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1996, 20 (01) :15-26
[8]   Relaxing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research using a hierarchical IRT model [J].
De Jong, Martijn G. ;
Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M. ;
Fox, Jean-Paul .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (02) :260-278
[9]  
Finney SJ, 2013, QUANT METH EDUC BEHA, P439
[10]   Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research: Current Practice and Recommendations [J].
Flake, Jessica K. ;
Pek, Jolynn ;
Hehman, Eric .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2017, 8 (04) :370-378