Individual factors influencing risk perceptions of hazardous chemicals in China

被引:19
作者
Liu, Tiezhong [1 ]
Zhang, Huyuan [1 ]
Li, Xiaowei [1 ]
Zhang, Hubo [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] China Elect Standardizat Inst, Beijing 100007, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Risk communication; Risk perceptions; Protective actions; Psychological factors; Ability factors; FLOOD RISK; PERCEIVED RISK; SOCIAL TRUST; CLIMATE; PREPAREDNESS; KNOWLEDGE; AWARENESS; EXPERTS; ACCEPTANCE; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2020.109523
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In view of the public concern about the possible risks posed by hazardous chemicals in China, the study on risk perceptions offer an important opportunity to assess the public's awareness of the risks of hazardous chemicals as well as to predict the public behaviors. More specifically, this paper discusses the individual factors that affect risk perceptions and protective actions with 1700 questionnaires six cities of China. It was found upon statistical analysis that only gender has a significant impact on risk perceptions of all demographic indicators; what is more, men have a higher level of risk perceptions than women. Upon further analysis, four factors are identified and analyzed which are thought to affect risk perceptions and protective actions. Furthermore, the logical relationships among various elements were analyzed with SEM model. Results: first, one psychological factor (responsibility) and two ability factors (knowledge, skills) can make positive effects on risk perceptions; second, one psychological factor (trust) exerts a negative effect on risk perceptions; third, while psychological factors do make positive effects on protective actions, no significant correlation is found between the ability factors and protective actions. Then it can be deduced that it is beneficial to build a trusting relationship between the public and the government as well as to strengthen the public's sense of responsibility.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[31]   The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence [J].
Lindell, Michael K. ;
Perry, Ronald W. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2012, 32 (04) :616-632
[32]   The role of values, environmental risk perception, awareness of consequences, and willingness to assume responsibility for environmentally-friendly behaviour: the Lithuanian case [J].
Liobikiene, Genovaite ;
Juknys, Romualdas .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 :3413-3422
[33]   Food-related hazards in China: Consumers' perceptions of risk and trust in information sources [J].
Liu, Rongduo ;
Pieniak, Zuzanna ;
Verbeke, Wim .
FOOD CONTROL, 2014, 46 :291-298
[34]   Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: A study in an alpine valley in Italy [J].
Miceli, Renato ;
Sotgiu, Igor ;
Settanni, Michele .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 28 (02) :164-173
[35]   Volcanic risk perception in rural communities along the slopes of mount Cameroon, West-Central Africa [J].
Njome, Manga S. ;
Suh, Cheo E. ;
Chuyong, George ;
de Wit, Maarten J. .
JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2010, 58 (04) :608-622
[36]   Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model [J].
Pavlou, PA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2003, 7 (03) :101-134
[37]   Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population [J].
Perko, Tanja .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2014, 133 :86-91
[38]   Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction [J].
Perlman, Amotz ;
Sacks, Rafael ;
Barak, Ronen .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 64 :22-31
[39]   Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation [J].
Raaijmakers, Ruud ;
Krywkow, Jorg ;
van der Veen, Anne .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2008, 46 (03) :307-322
[40]  
Renn O., 2008, RISK GOVERNANCE COPI