When Is Difficult Planning Good Planning? The Effects of Scenario-Based Planning on Optimistic Prediction Bias

被引:13
作者
Min, Kyeong Sam [1 ]
Arkes, Hal R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Orleans, Dept Mkt & Logist, Coll Business Adm, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
TASK-COMPLETION TIMES; IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS; SUBJECTIVE LIKELIHOOD; FALLACY; FUTURE; EASE; RETRIEVAL; JUDGMENTS; REAL; EXPLANATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00958.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
As a general rule, individuals tend to be optimistic in predicting when they will complete an upcoming activity. Building upon the ease of generation theory, we examined how dividing the planning process into multiple steps would impact the magnitude of optimism in real world planning. In Experiment 1 we found a decrease in optimistic prediction bias when individuals described their plans by generating a relatively difficult five-step, rather than a relatively easy two-step, optimistic scenario. In Experiment 2 the bias diminished when individuals generated the easy, rather than difficult, pessimistic scenario. In Experiment 3 the bias decreased even among individuals who generated the easy, rather than difficult, optimistic scenario when they were led to negatively interpret the feeling of ease.
引用
收藏
页码:2701 / 2729
页数:29
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   COSTS AND BENEFITS OF JUDGMENT ERRORS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBIASING [J].
ARKES, HR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (03) :486-498
[2]   Accuracy, error, and bias in predictions for real versus hypothetical events [J].
Armor, David A. ;
Sackett, Aaron M. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (04) :583-600
[3]   USE OF DECOMPOSITION PRINCIPLE IN MAKING JUDGMENTS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
DENNISTON, WB ;
GORDON, MM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1975, 14 (02) :257-263
[4]   The malleable meaning of subjective ease [J].
Briñol, P ;
Petty, RE ;
Tormala, ZL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (03) :200-206
[5]   EXPLORING THE PLANNING FALLACY - WHY PEOPLE UNDERESTIMATE THEIR TASK COMPLETION TIMES [J].
BUEHLER, R ;
GRIFFIN, D ;
ROSS, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (03) :366-381
[6]   Collaborative planning and prediction: Does group discussion affect optimistic biases in time estimation? [J].
Buehler, R ;
Messervey, D ;
Griffin, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2005, 97 (01) :47-63
[7]   Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions [J].
Buehler, R ;
Griffin, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 92 (1-2) :80-90
[8]   Finishing on time: When do predictions influence completion times? [J].
Buehler, Roger ;
Peetz, Johanna ;
Griffin, Dale .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2010, 111 (01) :23-32
[9]   Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time prediction [J].
Byram, SJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 1997, 3 (03) :216-239
[10]   Forsaking optimism [J].
Carroll, Patrick ;
Sweeny, Kate ;
Shepperd, James A. .
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 10 (01) :56-73