Recycling cellulase from enzymatic hydrolyzate of acid treated wheat straw by electroultrafiltration

被引:21
作者
Chen, Guoqiang [1 ,2 ]
Song, Weijie [1 ]
Qi, Benkun [1 ]
Lu, Jianren [3 ]
Wan, Yinhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Proc Engn, Natl Key Lab Biochem Engn, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Phys, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lignocellulosic hydrolyzate; Cellulase; Ultrafiltration; Electroultrafiltration; Concentration polarization; ELECTRIC-FIELD; CORN STOVER; ULTRAFILTRATION; MEMBRANE; ENHANCEMENT; PROTEINS; REACTOR; JUICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.089
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This work explores the feasibility of recycling cellulase by electroultrafiltration (EUF), an ultrafiltration process enhanced by an electric field, to reduce the cost of enzymatic transformation of cellulose. The effect of electric field under different operating conditions (buffer concentration, acid treated wheat straw concentration, current and temperature) on flux during EUF was examined. The results showed that EUF was effective to reduce concentration polarization (CP) and enhance filtration flux in recycling cellulase. The flux improvement by the electric field could be strengthened at low buffer concentration (5 mM) and relatively low temperature (room temperature) and high current (150 mA). The flux for 2% (substrate concentration, w/v) lignocellulosic hydrolyzate increased by a factor of 4.4 at 836 V/m and room temperature, compared to that without electric field. This work shows that under appropriate operating conditions EUF can efficiently recycle cellulase from lignocellulosic hydrolyzate and thus substantially reduce hydrolysis cost. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 193
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition during enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis II. Quantification of inhibition and suitability of membrane reactors [J].
Andric, Pavle ;
Meyer, Anne S. ;
Jensen, Peter A. ;
Dam-Johansen, Kim .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2010, 28 (03) :407-425
[2]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[3]   Air sparging in ultrafiltration hollow fibers:: relationship between flux enhancement, cake characteristics and hydrodynamic parameters [J].
Cabassud, C ;
Laborie, S ;
Durand-Bourlier, L ;
Lainé, JM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2001, 181 (01) :57-69
[4]   Membrane processes in biotechnology: An overview [J].
Charcosset, Catherine .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2006, 24 (05) :482-492
[5]   Status and barriers of advanced biofuel technologies: A review [J].
Cheng, Jay J. ;
Timilsina, Govinda R. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (12) :3541-3549
[6]   Electro-ultrafiltration of industrial enzyme solutions [J].
Enevoldsen, A. D. ;
Hansen, E. B. ;
Jonsson, G. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2007, 299 (1-2) :28-37
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF CELLULASE ACTIVITIES [J].
GHOSE, TK .
PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 1987, 59 (02) :257-268
[8]  
Goering HK, 1970, USDA Agricultural Handbook, V379
[9]   Removal of arsenic from groundwater by electro-ultrafiltration [J].
Hsieh, Lin-Han Chiang ;
Weng, Yu-Hsiang ;
Huang, Chin-Pao ;
Li, Kung-Cheh .
DESALINATION, 2008, 234 (1-3) :402-408
[10]   Crossflow membrane filtration enhanced by an external DC electric field:: A review [J].
Huotari, HM ;
Trägårdh, G ;
Huisman, IH .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 1999, 77 (A5) :461-468