Loud and Shouted Speech Perception at Variable Distances in a Forest

被引:1
作者
Meyer, Julien [1 ]
Meunier, Fanny [2 ]
Dentel, Laure [3 ]
Blanco, Noelia Do Carmo [2 ]
Sebe, Frederic [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, GIPSA Lab, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[2] Univ Cote Azur, CNRS, BCL, Nice, France
[3] World Whistles Res Assoc, Paris, France
[4] Univ Lyon St Etienne, CNRS, UMR 9197, Equipe Neuroethol Sensorielle,Neuro PSI, St Etienne, France
来源
19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2018), VOLS 1-6: SPEECH RESEARCH FOR EMERGING MARKETS IN MULTILINGUAL SOCIETIES | 2018年
关键词
word recognition. Lombard speech; shouted speech; speech adaptation; vowel and consonant recognition; NOISE; INTELLIGIBILITY; RECOGNITION; CONFUSIONS; SPEAKING;
D O I
10.21437/Interspeech.2018-2089
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
To increase the range of modal speech in natural ambient noise, individuals increase their vocal effort and may pass into the 'shouted speech' register. To date, most studies concerning the influence of distance on spoken communication in outdoor natural environments have focused on the 'productive side' of the human ability to tacitly adjust vocal output to compensate for acoustic losses due to sound propagation. Our study takes a slightly different path as it is based on an adaptive speech production/perception experiment. The setting was an outdoor natural soundscape (a plane forest in altitude). The stimuli were produced live during the interaction: each speaker adapted speech to transmit French disyllabic words in isolation to an interlocutor/listener who was situated at variable distances in the course of the experiment (30m, 60m, 90m). Speech recognition was explored by evaluating the ability of 16 normal-hearing French listeners to recognize these words and their constituent vowels and consonants. Results showed that in such conditions, speech adaptation was rather efficient as word recognition remained around 95% at 30m, 85% at 60m and 75% at 90m. We also observed striking differences in patterns of answers along several lines: different distances, speech registers, vowels and consonants.
引用
收藏
页码:2285 / 2289
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Anglade Y., 1990, STL RES REP, V2, P129
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM J AUDIOL
[3]   Analysis of English nonsense syllable recognition in noise [J].
Benkí, JR .
PHONETICA, 2003, 60 (02) :129-157
[4]   Talker-to-listener distance effects on speech production and perception [J].
Cheyne, Harold A. ;
Kalgaonkar, Kaustubh ;
Clements, Mark ;
Zurek, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 126 (04) :2052-2060
[5]   EFFECTS OF AMBIENT NOISE ON SPEAKER INTELLIGIBILITY FOR WORDS AND PHRASES [J].
DREHER, JJ ;
ONEILL, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1957, 29 (12) :1320-1323
[6]  
Fletcher Harvey., SPEECH AND HEARING
[7]   Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: Segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors [J].
Fogerty, Daniel ;
Humes, Larry E. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 128 (05) :3114-3125
[8]  
Fux T., THESIS
[9]   Speaking in noise: How does the Lombard effect improve acoustic contrasts between speech and ambient noise? [J].
Garnier, Maeva ;
Henrich, Nathalie .
COMPUTER SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2014, 28 (02) :580-597
[10]   Effect of Level of Distracting Noise upon Speaking Rate, Duration and Intensity [J].
Hanley, T. D. ;
Steer, M. D. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1949, 14 (04) :363-368