Tree Species Classification in Boreal Forests With Hyperspectral Data

被引:296
作者
Dalponte, Michele [1 ]
Orka, Hans Ole [2 ]
Gobakken, Terje [2 ]
Gianelle, Damiano [1 ]
Naesset, Erik [2 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Edmund Mach, Res & Innovat Ctr, Dept Sustainable Agroecosyst & Bioresources, I-38010 San Michele All Adige, TN, Italy
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Ecol & Nat Resource Management, NO-1432 As, Norway
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2013年 / 51卷 / 05期
关键词
Hyperspectral data; HySpex; spatial resolution; SWIR; tree species classification; visible and near infrared (VNIR); LIDAR DATA; INDIVIDUAL TREES; INTENSITY; SELECTION; HYPERION; SENSORS; LEAF;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2012.2216272
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Tree species mapping in forest areas is an important topic in forest inventory. In recent years, several studies have been carried out using different types of hyperspectral sensors under various forest conditions. The aim of this work was to evaluate the potential of two high spectral and spatial resolution hyperspectral sensors (HySpex-VNIR 1600 and HySpex-SWIR 320i), operating at different wavelengths, for tree species classification of boreal forests. To address this objective, many experiments were carried out, taking into consideration: 1) three classifiers (support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), and Gaussian maximum likelihood); 2) two spatial resolutions (1.5 m and 0.4 m pixel sizes); 3) two subsets of spectral bands (all and a selection); and 4) two spatial levels (pixel and tree levels). The study area is characterized by the presence of four classes 1) Norway spruce, 2) Scots pine, together with 3) scattered Birch and 4) other broadleaves. Our results showed that: 1) the HySpex VNIR 1600 sensor is effective in boreal tree species classification with kappa accuracies over 0.8 (with Pine and Spruce reaching producer's accuracies higher than 95%); 2) the role of the HySpex-SWIR 320i is limited, and its bands alone are able to properly separate only Pine and Spruce species; 3) the spatial resolution has a strong effect on the classification accuracy (an overall decrease of more than 20% between 0.4 m and 1.5 m spatial resolution); and 4) there is no significant difference between SVM or RF classifiers.
引用
收藏
页码:2632 / 2645
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 140 FAO UN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SKOGST 2008
[3]   A classification-based assessment of the optimal spectral and spatial resolutions for Great Lakes coastal wetland imagery [J].
Becker, Brian L. ;
Lusch, David P. ;
Qi, Jiaguo .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 108 (01) :111-120
[4]  
Bernstein LS, 2005, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P3549
[5]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[6]   An extension of the Jeffreys-Matusita distance to multiclass cases for feature selection [J].
Bruzzone, L ;
Roli, F ;
Serpico, SB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1995, 33 (06) :1318-1321
[7]  
Bruzzone L., 2007, HYPERSPECTRAL DATA E, P275
[8]   Characterisation and mapping of forest communities by clustering individual tree crowns [J].
Bunting, Peter ;
Lucas, Richard M. ;
Jones, Kerstin ;
Bean, Anthony R. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (11) :2536-2547
[9]   Evaluation of Random Forest and Adaboost tree-based ensemble classification and spectral band selection for ecotope mapping using airborne hyperspectral imagery [J].
Chan, Jonathan Cheung-Wai ;
Paelinckx, Desire .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 112 (06) :2999-3011
[10]  
Chen C., 2004, U CALIFORNIA BERKELE, V110, P24