Tangible Symbols as an AAC Option for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies

被引:10
作者
Roche, Laura [1 ]
Sigafoos, Jeff [1 ]
Lancioni, Giulio E. [2 ]
O'Reilly, Mark F. [3 ]
Green, Vanessa A. [1 ]
Sutherland, Dean [4 ]
van der Meer, Larah [1 ]
Schlosser, Ralf W. [5 ,6 ]
Marschik, Peter B. [7 ]
Edrisinha, Chaturi D. [8 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Educ Psychol, Wellington 6147, New Zealand
[2] Univ Bari, Dept Neurosci & Sense Organs, Bari, Italy
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Special Educ, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Univ Canterbury, Sch Hlth Sci, Christchurch 1, New Zealand
[5] Northeastern Univ, Dept Speech Language Pathol & Audiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Boston Childrens Hosp, Ctr Commun Enhancement, Boston, MA USA
[7] Med Univ Graz, Inst Physiol, Ctr Physiol Med, Graz, Austria
[8] St Cloud State Univ, Dept Community Psychol Counseling & Family Therap, St Cloud, MN 56301 USA
关键词
Augmentative and alternative communication; Developmental disabilities; Tangible symbols; Systematic review; EXCHANGE COMMUNICATION-SYSTEM; MULTIPLE DISABILITIES; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.3109/07434618.2013.878958
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
We reviewed nine studies evaluating the use of tangible symbols in AAC interventions for 129 individuals with developmental disabilities. Studies were summarized in terms of participants, tangible symbols used, communication functions/ skills targeted for intervention, intervention procedures, evaluation designs, and main findings. Tangible symbols mainly consisted of three-dimensional whole objects or partial objects. Symbols were taught as requests for preferred objects/activities in five studies with additional communication functions (e. g., naming, choice making, protesting) also taught in three studies. One study focused on naming activities. With intervention, 54% (n = 70) of the participants, who ranged from 3 to 20 years of age, learned to use tangible symbols to communicate. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution due to pre-experimental or quasi-experimental designs in five of the nine studies. Overall, tangible symbols appear promising, but additional studies are needed to establish their relative merits as a communication mode for people with developmental disabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 39
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Ali E, 2011, EDUC TRAIN AUTISM DE, V46, P425
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, VINELAND ADAPTIVE BE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Autism spectrum disorders and AAC
  • [4] Beukelman D. R., 2013, Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults, V4th ed.
  • [5] Teachers' and Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions about a Tangible Symbols Intervention: Efficacy, Generalization, and Recommendations
    Bruce, Susan M.
    Trief, Ellen
    Cascella, Paul W.
    [J]. AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2011, 27 (03) : 172 - 182
  • [6] Duker P., 2004, ONE TO ONE TRAINING
  • [7] Frost L., 2002, The picture exchange system training manual
  • [8] Kennedy C.H., 2005, Single-case designs for education research
  • [9] Behavioral interventions for rumination and operant vomiting in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
    Lang, Russell
    Mulloy, Austin
    Giesbers, Sanne
    Pfeiffer, Brooke
    Delaune, Elizabeth
    Didden, Robert
    Sigafoos, Jeff
    Lancioni, Giulio
    O'Reilly, Mark
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2011, 32 (06) : 2193 - 2205
  • [10] Teaching young people who are blind and have autism to make requests using a variation on the picture exchange communication system with tactile symbols: A preliminary investigation
    Lund, Shelley K.
    Troha, Jeanette M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2008, 38 (04) : 719 - 730