High efficiency 'low-lift' vapour-compression chiller for high-temperature cooling applications in non-residential buildings in hot-humid climates

被引:23
作者
Seshadri, Bharath [1 ]
Rysanek, Adam [1 ]
Schlueter, Arno [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Architecture DARCH, ITA, Architecture & Bldg Syst AS, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Low lift vapour compression chiller; High-temperature cooling; Radiant cooling; Hot-Humid climates; Singapore; EXERGY ANALYSIS; WIDE-RANGE; SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; OPERATION; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.028
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Over the last decade, building engineers have begun implementing sensible-latent de-coupled air-conditioning systems in non-residential buildings in hot-humid climates. Typically, a de-coupled system consists of a dedicated outdoor air sub-system for ventilation and high-temperature radiant cooling sub-system for space cooling. This approach has lowered cooling energy demands and fan energy consumption in buildings. However, the complete energy saving potential of de-coupled systems, specifically high-temperature space cooling sub-systems, can only be realized by using low-lift chillers that supply chilled water which matches the high-temperature radiant cooling application. This paper discusses the results of a retro-installation of a prototype modular low-lift chiller to provide high-temperature chilled water (at 17 degrees C) to the radiant cooling units. The paper presents temperature and cooling load profiles, control methodology and energy efficiency improvements of the low-lift cooling system. The paper also further discusses the influence of various parameters on the performance of the chiller. Despite having a cooling capacity of only 20 kW, the modular low-lift chiller is consistently able to achieve a Coefficient of Performance (COP) of 8. By operating at a low-lift (20 K) compared to a high-lift (29 K), the sensible cooling electrical consumption (at the chiller) is reduced by 23% despite being compared to a high-lift low-temperature chiller with 100 x higher cooling capacity. When normalized for cooling capacities, this reduction is between 29-30%. The project is the first known installation of low-lift cooling for building comfort control in hot-humid climates, and first reported publication of low-lift cooling in a real-life scenario - i.e., non-laboratory conditions or modelling exercise. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 37
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] A review on exergy analysis of vapor compression refrigeration system
    Ahamed, J. U.
    Saidur, R.
    Masjuki, H. H.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (03) : 1593 - 1600
  • [2] Optimal control development for chilled water plants using a quadratic representation
    Ahn, BC
    Mitchell, JW
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2001, 33 (04) : 371 - 378
  • [3] Ameen A, 2005, ASHRAE TRAN, V111, P225
  • [4] An analysis of the performances of a vapour compression plant working both as a water chiller and a heat pump using R22 and R417A
    Aprea, C
    Mastrullo, R
    Renno, C
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 24 (04) : 487 - 499
  • [5] Ashrae Green Guide, 2006, DES CONSTR OP SUST B
  • [6] B. CA. of Singapore, 2015, GREEN MARK NONR BUIL
  • [7] BubbleZERO-Design, Construction and Operation of a Transportable Research Laboratory for Low Exergy Building System Evaluation in the Tropics
    Bruelisauer, Marcel
    Chen, Kian Wee
    Iyengar, Rupesh
    Leibundgut, Hansjuerg
    Li, Cheng
    Li, Mo
    Mast, Matthias
    Meggers, Forrest
    Miller, Clayton
    Rossi, Dino
    Saber, Esmail M.
    Schlueter, Arno
    Tham, Kwok Wai
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2013, 6 (09): : 4551 - 4571
  • [8] Achieving better energy-efficient air conditioning - A review of technologies and strategies
    Chua, K. J.
    Chou, S. K.
    Yang, W. M.
    Yan, J.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 104 : 87 - 104
  • [9] Gasser L, 2008, WEXA EXERGY ANAL INC
  • [10] Predictive pre-cooling of thermo-active building systems with low-lift chillers
    Gayeski, N. T.
    Armstrong, P. R.
    Norford, L. K.
    [J]. HVAC&R RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (05): : 858 - 873