Spiders (Araneae) of Churchill, Manitoba: DNA barcodes and morphology reveal high species diversity and new Canadian records

被引:50
作者
Blagoev, Gergin A. [1 ]
Nikolova, Nadya I. [1 ]
Sobel, Crystal N. [1 ]
Hebert, Paul D. N. [1 ,2 ]
Adamowicz, Sarah J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Biodivers Inst Ontario, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Integrat Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Araneae; Biodiversity; COI; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I; DNA barcoding; iBOL; Spiders; Subarctic; Arctic; Barcoding biotas; GENUS PARDOSA ARANEAE; NORTH-AMERICA ARANEAE; EVOLUTIONARY; REVISION; TRICHOPTERA; EPHEMEROPTERA; PLECOPTERA; LYCOSIDAE; FAUNA; LIFE;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6785-13-44
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Background: Arctic ecosystems, especially those near transition zones, are expected to be strongly impacted by climate change. Because it is positioned on the ecotone between tundra and boreal forest, the Churchill area is a strategic locality for the analysis of shifts in faunal composition. This fact has motivated the effort to develop a comprehensive biodiversity inventory for the Churchill region by coupling DNA barcoding with morphological studies. The present study represents one element of this effort; it focuses on analysis of the spider fauna at Churchill. Results: 198 species were detected among 2704 spiders analyzed, tripling the count for the Churchill region. Estimates of overall diversity suggest that another 10-20 species await detection. Most species displayed little intraspecific sequence variation (maximum <1%) in the barcode region of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, but four species showed considerably higher values (maximum = 4.1-6.2%), suggesting cryptic species. All recognized species possessed a distinct haplotype array at COI with nearest-neighbour interspecific distances averaging 8.57%. Three species new to Canada were detected: Robertus lyrifer (Theridiidae), Baryphyma trifrons (Linyphiidae), and Satilatlas monticola (Linyphiidae). The first two species may represent human-mediated introductions linked to the port in Churchill, but the other species represents a range extension from the USA. The first description of the female of S. monticola was also presented. As well, one probable new species of Alopecosa (Lycosidae) was recognized. Conclusions: This study provides the first comprehensive DNA barcode reference library for the spider fauna of any region. Few cryptic species of spiders were detected, a result contrasting with the prevalence of undescribed species in several other terrestrial arthropod groups at Churchill. Because most (97.5%) sequence clusters at COI corresponded with a named taxon, DNA barcoding reliably identifies spiders in the Churchill fauna. The capacity of DNA barcoding to enable the identification of otherwise taxonomically ambiguous specimens (juveniles, females) also represents a major advance for future monitoring efforts on this group.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Aitchison-Benell C. W., 1990, Naturaliste Canadien (Quebec), V117, P215
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, INSECTS ARACHNIDS CA
[3]   Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes [J].
Barrett, RDH ;
Hebert, PDN .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2005, 83 (03) :481-491
[4]   The front-end logistics of DNA barcoding: challenges and prospects [J].
Borisenko, Alex V. ;
Sones, Jayme E. ;
Hebert, Paul D. N. .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2009, 9 :27-34
[5]  
Burns John M., 2007, Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, V61, P138
[6]  
Chamberlin B. V., 1943, Bulletin of the University of Utah Biological Series, V7, P1
[7]  
Chamberlin R.V., 1942, Bulletin of the University of Utah, V32, P1
[8]  
CHAMBERLIN RALPH V., 1958, BULL AMER MUS NAT HIST, V116, P1
[9]   The seven deadly sins of DNA barcoding [J].
Collins, R. A. ;
Cruickshank, R. H. .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2013, 13 (06) :969-975
[10]   Barcoding's next top model: an evaluation of nucleotide substitution models for specimen identification [J].
Collins, Rupert A. ;
Boykin, Laura M. ;
Cruickshank, Robert H. ;
Armstrong, Karen F. .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 3 (03) :457-465