3 Dimensions of Treatment Decision Making in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer

被引:15
作者
Pyke-Grimm, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Franck, Linda S. [2 ]
Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie [1 ,3 ]
Goldsby, Robert E. [4 ]
Rehm, Roberta S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lucile Packard Childrens Hosp Stanford, 725 Welch Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Nursing, Dept Family Hlth Care Nursing, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Div Adolescent Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Benioff Childrens Hosp, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Adolescents and young adults; Cancer; Decision making; CHILDRENS PARTICIPATION; CHRONIC ILLNESS; PARENTS; CARE; PERSPECTIVES; VIEWS; COMMUNICATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/NCC.0000000000000820
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) experience treatment nonadherence rates as high as 60%, which can increase the risk of cancer relapse. Involvement of AYAs in treatment decisions might support adherence to medical treatment. Objective The aim of this study was to explore the involvement of AYAs, aged 15 to 20 years, in cancer treatment decision making (TDM). Methods Using interpretive focused ethnography, we conducted interviews with 16 AYAs (total of 31 interviews) receiving cancer treatment within 1 year of diagnosis. Participants reflected on a major recent TDM experience (eg, clinical trial, surgery) and other treatment decisions. Results Participants distinguished important major cancer treatment decisions from minor supportive care decisions. We identified 3 common dimensions related to AYAs' involvement in cancer TDM: (1) becoming experienced with cancer, (2) import of the decision, and (3) decision-making roles. The preferences of AYAs for participation in TDM varied over time and by type of decision. We have proposed a 3-dimensional model to illustrate how these dimensions might interact to portray TDM during the first year of cancer treatment for AYAs. Conclusions As AYAs accumulate experience in making decisions, their TDM preferences might evolve at different rates depending on whether the decisions are perceived to be minor or major. Parents played a particularly important supportive role in TDM for AYA participants. Implications for Practice Clinicians should consider the AYAs' preferences and the role they want to assume in making different decisions in order to support and encourage involvement in their TDM and care.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 445
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] The management of cancer in the older adolescent
    Albritton, K
    Bleyer, WA
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 39 (18) : 2584 - 2599
  • [2] Albritton K, 2006, PROGR REV GROUP
  • [3] Brief report: Danish emerging adults' conceptions of adulthood
    Arnett, Jeffrey Jensen
    Padilla-Walker, Laura M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2015, 38 : 39 - 44
  • [4] SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) : 191 - 215
  • [5] A Qualitative Study of Phase III Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment Decision-Making: Perspectives from Adolescents, Young Adults, Caregivers, and Providers
    Barakat, Lamia P.
    Schwartz, Lisa A.
    Reilly, Anne
    Deatrick, Janet A.
    Balis, Frank
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2014, 3 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [6] Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer
    Beaver, K
    Luker, KA
    Owens, RG
    Leinster, SJ
    Degner, LF
    Sloan, JA
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 1996, 19 (01) : 8 - 19
  • [7] Global assessment of cancer incidence and survival in adolescents and young adults
    Bleyer, Archie
    Ferrari, Andrea
    Whelan, Jeremy
    Barr, Ronald D.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2017, 64 (09)
  • [8] Young Adults, Cancer, Health Insurance, Socioeconomic Status, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
    Bleyer, Archie
    Ulrich, Corinne
    Martin, Sean
    [J]. CANCER, 2012, 118 (24) : 6018 - 6021
  • [9] Bronfenbrenner U, 1979, ECOLOGY HUMAN DEV
  • [10] Broome M.E., 2001, Journal of Family Nursing, V7, P32, DOI DOI 10.1177/107484070100700103