Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients

被引:32
作者
Malik, HZ
George, WD
Mallon, EA
Harnett, AN
Macmillan, RD
Purushotham, AD
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Western Infirm, Dept Surg, Glasgow G11 6NT, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Glasgow, Western Infirm, Dept Pathol, Glasgow G11 6NT, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Western Infirm, Beatson Oncol Ctr, Glasgow G11 6NT, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Univ Nottingham, City Hosp, Dept Surg, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[5] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Surg, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 1999年 / 25卷 / 05期
关键词
breast-conserving surgery; tumour bed positivity; follow-up;
D O I
10.1053/ejso.1999.0680
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: To analyse cavity shaving as a method of assessing completeness of surgical excision after breast-conserving surgery. Methods: Shavings were taken from the wall of the cavity remaining in the breast after breast-conserving surgery in 543 women. Each shaving was extensively sectioned and the presence and type of microscopic disease recorded. Disease in cavity shavings (tumour bed positivity) was correlated with clinicopathological factors as well as overall survival. Results: Tumour bed positivity (TBP) was found in 37% of patients (16% with invasive disease). Patients were selected for further surgery according to the extent of positivity, which varied widely. A total of 15% of patients underwent re-excision or mastectomy. TBP was significantly associated with high tumour grade, presence of an extensive intraduct component, young age and large tumour diameter. It was also associated with a significantly shorter overall survival when compared to patients who were tumour bed negative. Conclusions: Cavity shaving is a practical and sensitive method of assessing completeness of excision after breast-conserving surgery. In addition it may provide useful prognostic information.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 469
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Blichert-Toft M, 1992, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P19
[2]   HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND PROGNOSIS IN BREAST CANCER - A STUDY OF 1409 CASES OF WHICH 359 HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED FOR 15 YEARS [J].
BLOOM, HJG ;
RICHARDSON, WW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1957, 11 (03) :359-&
[3]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[4]   SIGNIFICANCE OF IPSILATERAL BREAST-TUMOR RECURRENCE AFTER LUMPECTOMY [J].
FISHER, B ;
ANDERSON, S ;
FISHER, ER ;
REDMOND, C ;
WICKERHAM, DL ;
WOLMARK, N ;
MAMOUNAS, EP ;
DEUTSCH, M ;
MARGOLESE, R .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8763) :327-331
[5]  
Fisher B, 1992, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P7
[6]  
FRAZIER TG, 1989, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V124, P37
[7]  
HOLLAND R, 1985, CANCER, V56, P979, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<979::AID-CNCR2820560502>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-N
[9]   10-YEAR RESULTS OF A COMPARISON OF CONSERVATION WITH MASTECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF STAGE-I AND STAGE-II BREAST-CANCER [J].
JACOBSON, JA ;
DANFORTH, DN ;
COWAN, KH ;
DANGELO, T ;
STEINBERG, SM ;
PIERCE, L ;
LIPPMAN, ME ;
LICHTER, AS ;
GLATSTEIN, E ;
OKUNIEFF, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (14) :907-911
[10]   Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer [J].
Macmillan, RD ;
Purushotham, AD ;
George, WD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (02) :149-155