Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-mullerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles

被引:80
作者
Mutlu, Mehmet Firat [1 ]
Erdem, Mehmet [1 ]
Erdem, Ahmet [1 ]
Yildiz, Sule [1 ]
Mutlu, Ilknur [2 ]
Arisoy, Ozgur [3 ]
Oktem, Mesut [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Elazig Training & Res Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Elazig, Turkey
[3] Soke State Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Aydin, Turkey
关键词
Anti-mullerian hormone; Antral follicle counts; Ovarian response; Live birth; BECKMAN COULTER ELISA; SERUM INHIBIN-B; STIMULATING-HORMONE; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE; ASSISTED REPRODUCTION; ONGOING PREGNANCY; DSL ELISA; BASAL; IVF;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-013-9975-3
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
To determine the predictive value of serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) concentrations and antral follicle counts (AFC), on ovarian response and live birth rates after IVF and compare with age and basal FSH. Basal levels of AMH, FSH and antral follicle count were measured in 192 patients prior to IVF treatment. The predictive value of these parameters were evaluated in terms of retrieved oocyte number and live birth rates. Poor responders in IVF were older, had lower AFC and AMH but higher basal FSH levels. In multivariate analysis AFC was the best and only independent parameter among other parameters and AMH was better than age and basal FSH to predict poor response to ovarian stimulation. Addition of AMH, basal FSH, age and total gonadotropin dose to AFC did not improve its prognostic reliability. Area under curve (AUC) for each parameter according to ROC analysis also revealed that AFC performed better in poor response prediction compared with AMH, basal FSH and age. The cut-off point for mean AMH and AFC in discriminating the best between poor and normal ovarian response cycles was 0.94 ng/mL (with a sensitivity of 70 % and a specificity of 86 %) and 5.5 (with a sensitivity of 91 % and a specificity of 91 %), respectively. However, age was the only independent predictor of live birth in IVF as compared to hormonal and ultrasound indices of ovarian reserve. AFC is better than AMH to predict poor ovarian response. Although AMH and AFC could be used to predict ovarian response they had limited value in live birth prediction. The only significant predictor of the probability of achieving a live birth was age.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 665
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Impact of repeated antral follicle counts on the prediction of poor ovarian response in women undergoing in vitro fertilization
    Bancsi, LFJMM
    Broekmans, FJM
    Looman, CWN
    Habbema, JDF
    te Velde, ER
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [2] Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve
    Bancsi, LFJMM
    Broekmans, FJM
    Eijkemans, MJC
    de Jong, FH
    Habbema, JDF
    te Velde, ER
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (02) : 328 - 336
  • [3] Basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels are of limited value in predicting ongoing pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization
    Bancsi, LFJMM
    Huijs, AM
    den Ouden, CT
    Broekmans, FJM
    Looman, CWN
    Blankenstein, MA
    te Velde, ER
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (03) : 552 - 557
  • [4] Comparing anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as predictors of ovarian function
    Barad, David H.
    Weghofer, Andrea
    Gleicher, Norbert
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (04) : 1553 - 1555
  • [5] Measurement of anti-mullerian hormone by Beckman Coulter ELISA and DSL ELISA in assisted reproduction:: differences between serum and follicular fluid
    Bersinger, Nick A.
    Wunder, Dorothea
    Birkhaeuser, Martin H.
    Guibourdenche, Jean
    [J]. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 384 (1-2) : 174 - 175
  • [6] Boomsma C M, 2007, Reprod Biomed Online, V14 Spec No 1, P27, DOI 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61456-3
  • [7] A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome
    Broekmans, F. J.
    Kwee, J.
    Hendriks, D. J.
    Mol, B. W.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2006, 12 (06) : 685 - 718
  • [8] Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach
    Broer, Simone L.
    van Disseldorp, Jeroen
    Broeze, Kimiko A.
    Dolleman, Madeleine
    Opmeer, Brent C.
    Bossuyt, Patrick
    Eijkemans, Marinus J. C.
    Mol, Ben-Willem J.
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    Anderson, R. A.
    Ashrafi, M.
    Bancsi, L.
    Caroppo, E.
    Copperman, A.
    Ebner, T.
    Geva, Eldar M.
    Erdem, M.
    Greenblatt, E. M.
    Jayaprakasan, K.
    Fenning, Raine
    Klinkert, E. R.
    Kwee, J.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    La Marca, A.
    McIlveen, M.
    Merce, L. T.
    Muttukrishna, S.
    Nelson, S. M.
    Ng, H. Y.
    Popovic-Todorovic, B.
    Smeenk, J. M. J.
    Tomas, C.
    Van der Linden, P. J. Q.
    van Rooij, I. A.
    Vladimirov, I. K.
    Bossuyt, P. B.
    Eijkemans, M. J. C.
    Mol, B. W.
    Broekmans, Frank
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2013, 19 (01) : 26 - 36
  • [9] The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count
    Broer, Simtone L.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Hendriks, Dave
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (03) : 705 - 714
  • [10] Ovarian reserve testing and the use of prognostic models in patients with subfertility
    Bukman, A
    Heineman, MJ
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2001, 7 (06) : 581 - 590