Buprenorphine treatment outcome in dually diagnosed heroin dependent patients: A retrospective study

被引:62
作者
Gerra, G
Leonardi, C
D'Amore, A
Strepparola, G
Fagetti, R
Assi, C
Zaimovic, A
Lucchini, A
机构
[1] AUSL Parma, Addict Treatment Ctr, Parma, Italy
[2] ASL Rome C, Addict Treatment Dept, Rome, Italy
[3] ASL Caserta 2, Addict Treatment Dept, Caserta, Italy
[4] ASL Milan 2, Addict Treatment Dept, Milan, Italy
关键词
anxiety; buprenorphine; dual diagnosis treatment; heroin; major depression; personality disorder; schizophrenia; substance use disorder;
D O I
10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.10.007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The present study compared retrospectively in a clinical non-experimental setting the efficacy of buprenorphine (BLTP) in different subgroups of dually diagnosed and non-dually diagnosed opioid-dependent patients: all the subjects included in the study showed severe long-lasting heroin addiction and 68.4% were affected by psychiatric comorbidity. Participants (206) (mean age 32.2 +/- 8.9, 177 males-29 females) were applicants to a long-term buprenorphine treatment program (mean doses 7.9 +/- 0.42 mg). Aim of the study was to evaluate dual diagnosis variables possibly influencing retention rate and abstinence from illicit drugs. The patients were divided into 5 subgroups on the basis of dual diagnosis: group 1: major depression (MD) 29.61%; group 2: generalized anxiety (GAD) (11.2%); group 3: personality disorders (PD), antisocial-borderline (21.84%); group 4: schizophrenia (SC)(6.3%); group 5: substance use disorder without overt psychiatric comorbidity (SUD) (31.1%). Group I patients affected by MD showed the highest retention rate at 12 months (72.1%) in comparison with the other groups of patients: group 2 GAD (39.1%), group 3 PD (17.8%), group 4 SC (7.7%) and group 5 SUD, without comorbidity (45.3%) (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.002). Similarly, at 12 months, the patients affected by MD showed less risk of illicit opioid use (16.4%) than those affected by GAD (34.8%), PD, (42.2%), SC (53.8%) and SUD without comorbidity (34.4%) (p = 0.06, p = 0.003, p = 0.008, p = 0.017). When evaluated on the whole sample, retention rate was not influenced by dose. In contrast, the higher BUP doses were associated with less risk of illicit opioid use, than lower doses (p <0.001). Multivariate analysis and factor analysis showed a greater association of outcome measures (retention rate and negative urines rate) with comorbid diagnosis (depression) (respectively 0.64) than with buprenorphine doses (respectively 0.54). Our data need to be interpreted with caution because of the retrospective methodology applied to a clinical non-experimental setting. BUP seems to be more effective in opioid-dependent patients affected by depression, probably due to the kappa opioid-receptors antagonist action, counteracting dysphoria, negativism and anxiety. High doses of BUP appear to predict a better outcome, in terms of negative urines, but not in terms of retention. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 272
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] A meta-analysis comparing buprenorphine to methadone for treatment of opiate dependence
    Barnett, PG
    Rodgers, JH
    Bloch, DA
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2001, 96 (05) : 683 - 690
  • [2] BUPRENORPHINE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY DEPRESSION
    BODKIN, JA
    ZORNBERG, GL
    LUKAS, SE
    COLE, JO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 15 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [3] Calogero AE, 1996, J NEUROENDOCRINOL, V8, P579
  • [4] Buprenorphine sublingual tablets: effects on IV heroin self-administration by humans
    Comer, SD
    Collins, ED
    Fischman, MW
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 154 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [5] Personality, substance of choice, and polysubstance involvement among substance dependent patients
    Conway, KP
    Kane, RJ
    Ball, SA
    Poling, JC
    Rounsaville, BJ
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2003, 71 (01) : 65 - 75
  • [6] Depressive symptoms during buprenorphine vs. methadone maintenance: findings from a randomised, controlled trial in opioid dependence
    Dean, AJ
    Bell, J
    Christie, MJ
    Mattick, RP
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 19 (08) : 510 - 513
  • [7] CURRENT PERSPECTIVES IN THE PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY OF DEPRESSION AND MANIA
    EMRICH, HM
    GUNTHER, R
    DOSE, M
    [J]. NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1983, 22 : 385 - 388
  • [8] FAVA M, 1993, INTERVISTA CLIN STRU
  • [9] Fischer G, 1999, NERVENARZT, V70, P795, DOI 10.1007/s001150050514
  • [10] Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance for the treatment of opioid dependence
    Fischer, G
    Gombas, W
    Eder, H
    Jagsch, R
    Peternell, A
    Stühlinger, G
    Pezawas, L
    Aschauer, HN
    Kasper, S
    [J]. ADDICTION, 1999, 94 (09) : 1337 - 1347