Comparison of microbial communities during anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste: Effect of substrate sources and temperatures

被引:57
作者
Jiang, Junfeng [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Wu, Peiwen [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Sun, Yongming [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Guo, Yufang [2 ,5 ]
Song, Bing [6 ]
Huang, Yi [2 ,5 ]
Xing, Tao [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Lianhua [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Energy Convers, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Radionuclides Pollut Contr, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Key Lab,Minist Educ Water Qual Secur & Protect Pe, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, CAS Key Lab Renewable Energy, Guangzhou Inst Energy Convers, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Key Lab New & Renewable Energy Res & De, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Univ, Linkoping Univ Guangzhou Univ Res Ctr Urban Susta, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[6] Scion, Clean Technol, 49 Sala St,Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand
关键词
Kitchen waste; Anaerobic digestion; Microbial community; Sources; Temperature; FOOD WASTE; CO-DIGESTION; PROCESS STABILITY; ENERGY RECOVERY; PERFORMANCE; BIOGAS; INOCULUM; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124016
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In this study, batch experiments were conducted to compare the effect of temperature and substrate source on microbial communities in the anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste. The results showed that the microbial communities of anaerobic digestion were not sensitive to varied sources of waste, but shifted with the change in operating temperatures. In the reactors operated at mesophilic conditions, Levilinea, Syntrophomonas, Methanothrbc, and Methanosphaerula, etc. were the dominant microbes during the process. While in thermophilic reactors, Levilinea, Ornatilinea, Methanosphaerula and Methanomassiliicoccus, etc. prevailed. Meanwhile, an enrichment in Coprothermobacter, Defluviitoga, Defluviitalea, Tepidimicrobium, Lutispora and Fonticella were observed as the temperature changed from mesophilic to thermophilic, suggesting these genera could be selectively enriched at thermophilic conditions. The results provided fundamental understanding of the microbiology that could support the scale up of food waste anaerobic digestion.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of adding osmoprotectant on anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste with high level of salinity
    Liu, Yanping
    Yuan, Yu
    Wang, Wei
    Wachemo, Akiber Chufo
    Zou, Dexun
    JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING, 2019, 128 (06) : 723 - 732
  • [42] New insights into microplastics inhibiting kitchen waste dry digestion: Digestion efficiency, microbial communities and microplastic aging mechanisms
    Zhao, Jianwei
    Wang, Yuxin
    Li, Boyang
    Zhang, Jinxu
    Guan, Dezheng
    Hu, Yuying
    Fan, Hongyong
    Sun, Yingjie
    Wang, Huawei
    Guo, Liang
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2025, 508
  • [43] Comparison of microbial communities during the anaerobic digestion of Gracilaria under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions
    Azizi, Aqil
    Kim, Wonduck
    Lee, Jung Hyun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 32 (10)
  • [44] Comparison of microbial communities during the anaerobic digestion of Gracilaria under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions
    Aqil Azizi
    Wonduck Kim
    Jung Hyun Lee
    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016, 32
  • [45] Startup performance and microbial communities of a decentralized anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Tiong, Yong Wei
    Sharma, Pooja
    Tian, Hailin
    Tsui, To-Hung
    Lam, Heng Thong
    Tong, Yen Wah
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2023, 318
  • [46] Biodegradation of Dog Waste Through Anaerobic Digestion at Different Temperatures
    Fiaes, Gabriela Maria Fernandes
    Rosa, Andre Pereira
    Nascimento, Larissa Almeida
    Passos, Fabiana Lopes Del Rei
    Borges, Alisson Carraro
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2024, : 1973 - 1985
  • [47] Optimization and microbial diversity of anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with waste kitchen oil at high organic loading rates
    Duong, Cuong Manh
    Lim, Teng-Teeh
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 154 : 199 - 208
  • [48] Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion using kitchen waste and poultry manure as substrate—part 1: substrate ratio and effect of temperature
    Md Anisur Rahman
    Razu Shahazi
    Syada Noureen Basher Nova
    M. Rakib Uddin
    Md Shahadat Hossain
    Abu Yousuf
    Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2023, 13 : 6635 - 6645
  • [49] Multivariate insights into enhanced biogas production in thermophilic dry anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with kitchen waste or garden waste: Process properties, microbial communities and metagenomic analyses
    Zhang, Siying
    Xiao, Mengyao
    Liang, Chengyu
    Chui, Chunmeng
    Wang, Na
    Shi, Jiping
    Liu, Li
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 361
  • [50] Deeper insights into the effects of substrate to inoculum ratio selection on the relationship of kinetic parameters, microbial communities, and key metabolic pathways during the anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Li, Yanzeng
    Chen, Zhou
    Peng, Yanyan
    Huang, Weizhao
    Liu, Junxiao
    Mironov, Vladimir
    Zhang, Shenghua
    WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 217