Comparison of microbial communities during anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste: Effect of substrate sources and temperatures

被引:59
作者
Jiang, Junfeng [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Wu, Peiwen [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Sun, Yongming [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Guo, Yufang [2 ,5 ]
Song, Bing [6 ]
Huang, Yi [2 ,5 ]
Xing, Tao [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Lianhua [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Energy Convers, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Radionuclides Pollut Contr, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Key Lab,Minist Educ Water Qual Secur & Protect Pe, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, CAS Key Lab Renewable Energy, Guangzhou Inst Energy Convers, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Key Lab New & Renewable Energy Res & De, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Univ, Linkoping Univ Guangzhou Univ Res Ctr Urban Susta, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[6] Scion, Clean Technol, 49 Sala St,Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand
关键词
Kitchen waste; Anaerobic digestion; Microbial community; Sources; Temperature; FOOD WASTE; CO-DIGESTION; PROCESS STABILITY; ENERGY RECOVERY; PERFORMANCE; BIOGAS; INOCULUM; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124016
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In this study, batch experiments were conducted to compare the effect of temperature and substrate source on microbial communities in the anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste. The results showed that the microbial communities of anaerobic digestion were not sensitive to varied sources of waste, but shifted with the change in operating temperatures. In the reactors operated at mesophilic conditions, Levilinea, Syntrophomonas, Methanothrbc, and Methanosphaerula, etc. were the dominant microbes during the process. While in thermophilic reactors, Levilinea, Ornatilinea, Methanosphaerula and Methanomassiliicoccus, etc. prevailed. Meanwhile, an enrichment in Coprothermobacter, Defluviitoga, Defluviitalea, Tepidimicrobium, Lutispora and Fonticella were observed as the temperature changed from mesophilic to thermophilic, suggesting these genera could be selectively enriched at thermophilic conditions. The results provided fundamental understanding of the microbiology that could support the scale up of food waste anaerobic digestion.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GB50099
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GB50098
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, STANDARD METHODS EXA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GB50095
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, GB28050
[6]  
Bashir MS, 2019, J CHEM SOC PAKISTAN, V41, P563
[7]   Effect of shear velocity and feed concentration on the treatment of food waste in an anaerobic dynamic membrane Bioreactor: Performance Monitoring and microbial community analysis [J].
Cayetano, Roent Dune A. ;
Park, Jong-Hun ;
Kim, Sang-Hyoun .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 296
[8]   Microbial responses and metabolic pathways reveal the recovery mechanism of an anaerobic digestion system subjected to progressive inhibition by ammonia [J].
Chen, Sisi ;
He, Jin ;
Wang, Hongyang ;
Dong, Bin ;
Li, Ning ;
Dai, Xiaohu .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 350 :312-323
[9]   Comprehensively evaluating the digestive performance of sludge with different lignocellulosic components in mesophilic anaerobic digester [J].
Chen, Yongdong ;
Yang, Haifeng ;
Zhao, Ziyan ;
Zou, Huijing ;
Zhu, Ruilin ;
Jiang, Qin ;
Sun, Tong ;
Li, Mingxing ;
Li, Li ;
Shi, Dezhi ;
Ai, Hainan ;
He, Qiang ;
Gu, Li .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 293
[10]   Dry semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of food waste in the mesophilic and thermophilic modes: New aspects of sustainable management and energy recovery in South Korea [J].
Dinh Duc Nguyen ;
Chang, Soon Woong ;
Cha, Jae Hun ;
Jeong, Seong Yeob ;
Yoon, Yong Soo ;
Lee, Sin Jin ;
Minh Chi Tran ;
Ngo, Huu Hao .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 135 :445-452