Evaluation of effectiveness of China's carbon emissions trading scheme in carbon mitigation

被引:280
作者
Gao, Yuning [1 ]
Li, Meng [1 ]
Xue, Jinjun [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Liu, Yu [6 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Ctr Hubei Cooperat Innovat Emiss Trading Syst, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Management & Econ, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[4] UIBE, China Inst Global Low Carbon Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Nagoya Univ, Econ Res Ctr, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emissions trading scheme; Carbon mitigation policy; Policy evaluation; Difference-in-differences; MARKET AFFECT; CO2; INTENSITY; IMPACTS; WILL; ETS; ECONOMIES; REDUCTION; INDUSTRY; PILOTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104872
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In response to climate change issues, China has set clear targets to reduce emissions. The establishment of a carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) has an important role in China's achievement of these targets. China designed its ETS in 2011 and implemented it in pilot regions in 2013. This study investigated whether the ETS reduces carbon emissions and how it influences carbon leakage. First, the production-based emissions, consumption-based emissions, and carbon leakage of 28 industries in 30 provinces during 2005-2015 were calculated based on provincial environmentally extended input-output tables. Then, the difference-in-differences and difference-in-difference-in-differences models were used to evaluate the effectiveness of ETS. The following conclusions were derived. (1) ETS contributes to emissions mitigation in pilot regions and industries. (2) ETS has greater effect on the mitigation of production-based emissions than consumption-based emissions. (3) ETS encourages outsourcing of emissions from pilot areas to non-pilot areas, resulting in carbon leakage (or "pollution haven" effect), which aggravates the imbalance of emissions transfers among China's provinces. The success of China's ETS in promoting emissions mitigation can serve as an example for other emerging economies. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
[31]  
Lenzen M., 2004, ECON SYST RES, V16, P391, DOI DOI 10.1080/0953531042000304272
[32]  
Lin B.Q. Liu., 2010, EC RES J, V8, P66
[33]   What will China's carbon emission trading market affect with only electricity sector involvement? A CGE based study [J].
Lin, Boqiang ;
Jia, Zhijie .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 78 (301-311) :301-311
[34]   The impact of Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) and the choice of coverage industry in ETS: A case study in China [J].
Lin, Boqiang ;
Jia, Zhijie .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 205 :1512-1527
[35]   Accounting for China's regional carbon emissions in 2002 and 2007: production-based versus consumption-based principles [J].
Liu, Lan-Cui ;
Liang, Qiao-Mei ;
Wang, Qian .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 103 :384-392
[36]   Assessment of impacts of Hubei Pilot emission trading schemes in China - A CGE-analysis using TermCO2 model [J].
Liu, Yu ;
Tan, Xiu-Jie ;
Yu, Yang ;
Qi, Shao-Zhou .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 189 :762-769
[37]   COMMENTARY: Carbon emissions trading in China [J].
Lo, Alex Y. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 2 (11) :765-766
[38]   Privatizing Climate Change Policy: Is there a Public Benefit? [J].
Matisoff, Daniel C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (03) :409-433
[39]   A modified GHG intensity indicator: Toward a sustainable global economy based on a carbon border tax and emissions trading [J].
Moghaddam, Reza Farrahi ;
Moghaddam, Fereydoun Farrahi ;
Cheriet, Mohamed .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 57 :363-380
[40]   CO2 accounts for open economies:: producer or consumer responsibility? [J].
Munksgaard, J ;
Pedersen, KA .
ENERGY POLICY, 2001, 29 (04) :327-334