Evaluation of effectiveness of China's carbon emissions trading scheme in carbon mitigation

被引:263
作者
Gao, Yuning [1 ]
Li, Meng [1 ]
Xue, Jinjun [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Liu, Yu [6 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Ctr Hubei Cooperat Innovat Emiss Trading Syst, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Management & Econ, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[4] UIBE, China Inst Global Low Carbon Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Nagoya Univ, Econ Res Ctr, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emissions trading scheme; Carbon mitigation policy; Policy evaluation; Difference-in-differences; MARKET AFFECT; CO2; INTENSITY; IMPACTS; WILL; ETS; ECONOMIES; REDUCTION; INDUSTRY; PILOTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104872
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In response to climate change issues, China has set clear targets to reduce emissions. The establishment of a carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) has an important role in China's achievement of these targets. China designed its ETS in 2011 and implemented it in pilot regions in 2013. This study investigated whether the ETS reduces carbon emissions and how it influences carbon leakage. First, the production-based emissions, consumption-based emissions, and carbon leakage of 28 industries in 30 provinces during 2005-2015 were calculated based on provincial environmentally extended input-output tables. Then, the difference-in-differences and difference-in-difference-in-differences models were used to evaluate the effectiveness of ETS. The following conclusions were derived. (1) ETS contributes to emissions mitigation in pilot regions and industries. (2) ETS has greater effect on the mitigation of production-based emissions than consumption-based emissions. (3) ETS encourages outsourcing of emissions from pilot areas to non-pilot areas, resulting in carbon leakage (or "pollution haven" effect), which aggravates the imbalance of emissions transfers among China's provinces. The success of China's ETS in promoting emissions mitigation can serve as an example for other emerging economies. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators [J].
Abadie, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 72 (01) :1-19
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, NAT CLIM CHANGE, DOI DOI 10.1038/CLIMATE.2008.25
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, US CHINA JOINT ANNOU
[4]   Carbon pricing in the EU: Evaluation of different EU ETS reform options [J].
Brink, Corjan ;
Vollebergh, Herman R. J. ;
van der Werf, Edwin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 97 :603-617
[5]  
Bryner G.C., 2003, TUL ENV LJ, V17, P267
[6]   China's emissions trading system and an ETS-carbon tax hybrid [J].
Cao, Jing ;
Ho, Mun S. ;
Jorgenson, Dale W. ;
Nielsen, Chris P. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 :741-753
[7]  
Change I.C., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014
[8]   How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China's 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? [J].
Cui, Lian-Biao ;
Fan, Ying ;
Zhu, Lei ;
Bi, Qing-Hua .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 136 :1043-1052
[9]   Assessment of China's climate commitment and non-fossil energy plan towards 2020 using hybrid AIM/CGE model [J].
Dai, Hancheng ;
Masui, Toshihiko ;
Matsuoka, Yuzuru ;
Fujimori, Shinichiro .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) :2875-2887
[10]  
Development N. B. Reform Commission, 2011, NOT WORK PIL CARB EM