Comparison of upscaling cropland and non-cropland map using uncertainty weighted majority rule-based and the majority rule-based aggregation methods

被引:2
作者
Sun, Peijun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pan, Yaozhong [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jinshui [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Upscale; aggregation; uncertainty weighted; majority rule; cropland map; LAND-COVER; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; SCALE; CLASSIFICATION; MODEL; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1080/10106049.2017.1377773
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aggregation method is seriously impacted by the landscape characteristics, which has been emphasized due to proportional errors. This research proposed an uncertainty weighted majority rule-based aggregation method (UWMRB) to upscale the cropland/non-cropland map. The Cropland Data Layer for 2016 at 30m resolution, with its corresponding confidence level data, were collected to conduct the experiment using UWMRB and majority rule-based aggregation method. Proportional errors of crop/non-crop were used to assess the accuracy of the two methods. Ordinal logistic regression was used to obtain the probability of an error occurring to predict the uncertainty of both methods. The results show that UWMRB can achieve the lower proportional errors with lower uncertainty. Also, it can reduce the influence of complexity and fragmentation of landscape on aggregation performance. Additionally, the examination of UWMRB provides an important view of application of uncertainty information for upscaling land cover maps in an efficient way.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 163
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, REMOTE SENSING LANDS
  • [2] [Anonymous], IBM SPSS STAT 19 ADV
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics
  • [4] Assessing Consistency of Five Global Land Cover Data Sets in China
    Bai, Yan
    Feng, Min
    Jiang, Hao
    Wang, Juanle
    Zhu, Yunqiang
    Liu, Yingzhen
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 6 (09) : 8739 - 8759
  • [5] GLC2000:: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data
    Bartholomé, E
    Belward, AS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 26 (09) : 1959 - 1977
  • [6] Monitoring US agriculture: the US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Cropland Data Layer Program
    Boryan, Claire
    Yang, Zhengwei
    Mueller, Rick
    Craig, Mike
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 26 (05) : 341 - 358
  • [7] Global Land Cover Mapping: A Review and Uncertainty Analysis
    Congalton, Russell G.
    Gu, Jianyu
    Yadav, Kamini
    Thenkabail, Prasad
    Ozdogan, Mutlu
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 6 (12) : 12070 - 12093
  • [8] THE INTERACTIVE EFFECT OF SPATIAL-RESOLUTION AND DEGREE OF INTERNAL VARIABILITY WITHIN LAND-COVER TYPES ON CLASSIFICATION ACCURACIES
    CUSHNIE, JL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1987, 8 (01) : 15 - 29
  • [9] Spatial statistics, spatial regression, and graph theory in ecology
    Fortin, Marie-Josee
    James, Patrick M. A.
    MacKenzie, Alistair
    Melles, Stephanie J.
    Rayfield, Bronwyn
    [J]. SPATIAL STATISTICS, 2012, 1 : 100 - 109
  • [10] MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets
    Friedl, Mark A.
    Sulla-Menashe, Damien
    Tan, Bin
    Schneider, Annemarie
    Ramankutty, Navin
    Sibley, Adam
    Huang, Xiaoman
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (01) : 168 - 182