Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method

被引:21
作者
Cakir, B [1 ]
Richter, M [1 ]
Puhl, W [1 ]
Schmidt, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Orthopaed & Spinal Cord Injury, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
关键词
disc replacement surgery; functional radiography; lumbar range of motion; reliability;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-005-0942-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
As motion preservation is one of the main postulated advantages after total disc replacement (TDR) of the lumbar spine, the quantification of the mobility after TDR seems of special clinical interest. Yet, the best method to assess range of motion (ROM) after TDR remains unclear. The aim of the study was the calculation of 95%-confidence intervals (95%-C.I.) for the measurement error accompanying: (1) different methods (2) different observers and (3) different levels of training for radiographic motion analysis after TDR. In 12 patients the level L4-L5 and in another 12 patients level L5-S1 were measured with the Cobb and the superimposition method on flexion-extension X-rays after monosegmental TDR. Both methods were adopted as the landmarks used the spikes of the prosthesis instead the endplates (spike method) and the fin of the prosthesis instead the whole vertebral body (fin method). Measurements were performed by two experienced (O-I and O-III) and one inexperienced observer (O-II). The adopted spike and fin method showed a better reliability compared to the reported results of the original Cobb and superimposition method. The method used was not clinically relevant for the intraobserver reliability in the experienced observer (95%-C.I.: +/- 2.0 degrees for the fin and +/- 2.1 for the spike method) and for the interobserver reliability for two experienced observers (95%-C.I.: -2.8 degrees/+2.8 degrees for the fin and -2.9 degrees/+3.1 degrees for the spike method). The intraobserver reliability for the inexperienced observer was inferior for both methods compared to the experienced observer but no clinically relevant differences could be observed in interobserver reliability measures. The spike and fin method are reliable methods for study protocols dealing with angular motion after TDR as clinically valid conclusions can be drawn with an accuracy of about +/- 2 degrees for the same observer and with an accuracy of about +/- 3 degrees for a different observer.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 173
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A TECHNIQUE FOR QUANTIFYING THE BENDING MOMENT ACTING ON THE LUMBAR SPINE INVIVO [J].
ADAMS, MA ;
DOLAN, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1991, 24 (02) :117-126
[2]   Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications [J].
Bertagnoli, R ;
Kumar, S .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2002, 11 (Suppl 2) :S131-S136
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   LUMBOSACRAL SEGMENTAL MOTION IN NORMAL INDIVIDUALS - HAVE WE BEEN MEASURING INSTABILITY PROPERLY [J].
BODEN, SD ;
WIESEL, SW .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (06) :571-576
[5]   Sagittal alignment and segmental range of motion after total disc replacement of the lumbar spine [J].
Cakir, B ;
Schmidt, R ;
Huch, K ;
Puhl, W ;
Richter, M .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2004, 142 (02) :159-165
[6]   Relationship between pain and vertebral motion in chronic low-back pain subjects [J].
Dickey, JP ;
Pierrynowski, MR ;
Bednar, DA ;
Yang, SX .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (05) :345-352
[7]   MOTION OF THE LUMBAR SPINE - RELIABILITY OF 2 MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES [J].
DILLARD, J ;
TRAFIMOW, J ;
ANDERSSON, GBJ ;
CRONIN, K .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (03) :321-324
[8]   CLINICAL VALIDATION OF FUNCTIONAL FLEXION EXTENSION ROENTGENOGRAMS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
DVORAK, J ;
PANJABI, MM ;
NOVOTNY, JE ;
CHANG, DG ;
GROB, D .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (08) :943-950
[9]  
DVORAK J, 1991, SPINE, V16, P562
[10]  
Eck J C, 1999, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V28, P336