Differential attentional bias in generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder

被引:16
作者
Chen, Jing [1 ]
Wang, Zhiyan [1 ]
Wu, Yan [1 ]
Cai, Yiyun [1 ]
Shen, Yifeng [1 ]
Wang, Liwei [1 ]
Shi, Shenxun [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Psychiat, Huashan Hosp, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
generalized anxiety disorder; panic disorder; attentional bias; emotional Stroop task; EMOTIONAL STROOP TASK; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; THREAT CUES; SOCIAL PHOBIA; INFORMATION; CHILDREN; SUPPRESSION; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.2147/NDT.S36822
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cognitive theorists relate anxiety disorders to the way in which emotional information is processed. The existing research suggests that patients with anxiety disorders tend to allocate their attention toward threat-related information selectively, and this may differ among different types of anxious subjects. The aim of this study was to explore attentional bias in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and panic disorder (PD) using the emotional Stroop task and compare the differences between them. Methods: Forty-two patients with GAD, 34 patients with PD, and 46 healthy controls performed the emotional Stroop task with four word types, ie, GAD-related words, PD-related words, neutral words, and positive words. Results: Patients with GAD and those with PD were slower than healthy controls to respond to all stimuli. Patients with GAD had longer response latencies in color-naming both PD-relevant words and GAD relevant words. Patients with PD had longer response latencies only in color-naming PD-related words, similar to healthy controls. Conclusion: Patients with GAD and those with PD had a different pattern of attentional bias, and there was insufficient evidence to support the existence of specific attentional bias in patients with PD.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 80
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect [J].
Algom, D ;
Chajut, E ;
Lev, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (03) :323-338
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, STRUCTURED CLIN INTE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[4]   SELECTIVE ATTENTION TOWARD PHYSICAL THREAT IN PATIENTS WITH PANIC DISORDER [J].
ASMUNDSON, GJG ;
SANDLER, LS ;
WILSON, KG ;
WALKER, JR .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 1992, 6 (04) :295-303
[5]  
ASMUNDSON GJG, 1994, ANXIETY, V1, P123
[6]   An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes [J].
Beck, AT ;
Clark, DA .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1997, 35 (01) :49-58
[7]   The emotional Stroop effect in anxiety disorders - General emotionality or disorder specificity? [J].
Becker, ES ;
Rinck, M ;
Margraf, J ;
Roth, WT .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2001, 15 (03) :147-159
[8]   Why do non-color words interfere with color naming? [J].
Burt, JS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2002, 28 (05) :1019-1038
[9]  
Chen SH, 2005, PERSONALITY COGNITIO
[10]   Suppression of attentional bias in PTSD [J].
Constans, JI ;
McCloskey, MS ;
Vasterling, JJ ;
Brailey, K ;
Mathews, A .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 113 (02) :315-323