A fuzzy-stochastic OWA model for robust Multi-Criteria Decision Making

被引:62
作者
Zarghami, Mahdi [1 ,2 ]
Szidarovszky, Ferenc [2 ]
Ardakanian, Reza [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tabriz, Fac Civil Engn, Tabriz 51664, Iran
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Syst & Ind Engn, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Tehran 113659313, Iran
关键词
Multi-Criteria Decision Making; ordered weighted averaging (OWA); fuzzy linguistic quantifiers; stochastic uncertainty;
D O I
10.1007/s10700-007-9021-y
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
All realistic Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problems face various kinds of uncertainty. Since the evaluations of alternatives with respect to the criteria are uncertain they will be assumed to have stochastic nature. To obtain the uncertain optimism degree of the decision maker fuzzy linguistic quantifiers will be used. Then a new approach for fuzzy-stochastic modeling of MCDM problems will be introduced by merging the stochastic and fuzzy approaches into the OWA operator. The results of the new approach, entitled FSOWA, give the expected value and the variance of the combined goodness measure for each alternative. Robust decision depends on the combined goodness measures of alternatives and also on the variations of these measures under uncertainty. In order to combine these two characteristics a composite goodness measure will be defined. The theoretical results will be illustrated in a watershed management problem. By using this measure will give more sensitive decisions to the stakeholders whose optimism degrees are different than that of the decision maker. FSOWA can be used for robust decision making on the competitive alternatives under uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, FUZZY MULTIPLE ATTRI
[2]   Fuzzy satisfying stochastic multi-objective generation' scheduling by weightage pattern search methods [J].
Bath, SK ;
Dhillon, JS ;
Kothari, DP .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2004, 69 (2-3) :311-320
[3]  
Bellman R. E., 1971, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
[4]  
Ben Abdelaziz F, 2004, INFOR, V42, P201
[5]   Dominance and efficiency in multicriteria decision under uncertainty [J].
Ben Abdelaziz, F ;
Lang, P ;
Nadeau, R .
THEORY AND DECISION, 1999, 47 (03) :191-211
[6]  
BENARIEH D, 2004, P C IERC 2004 HOUST
[7]   A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty [J].
Bender, MJ ;
Simonovic, SP .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :35-44
[8]   A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators [J].
Bordogna, G ;
Fedrizzi, M ;
Pasi, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1997, 27 (01) :126-132
[9]   STOCHASTIC VERSUS POSSIBILISTIC PROGRAMMING [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1990, 34 (02) :173-177
[10]   Stochastic approach versus multiobjective approach for obtaining efficient solutions in stochastic multiobjective programming problems [J].
Caballero, R ;
Cerdá, B ;
Muñoz, MD ;
Rey, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 158 (03) :633-648