Digital Rectal Examination and the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer-a Study Based on 8 Years and Three Screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam

被引:23
作者
Gosselaar, Claartje [1 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [1 ]
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. [1 ]
Wolters, Tineke [1 ]
Schroder, Fritz H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Digital rectal examination; Prostate cancer; Screening; Screening interval; CLINICAL STAGE T1C; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; TUMOR CHARACTERISTICS; 4; NG/ML; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; TRIAL; MEN; ROUNDS; INTERVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.079
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Evidence indicates that an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) is a risk factor for high-grade prostate cancer (PC). Objective: To deter-mine whether men with an initially suspicious DRE, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >= 3.0 ng/ml, and a benign prostate biopsy are at higher risk for significant PC at rescreening than men with an initially normal DRE, and whether an adaptation of the rescreening interval is war-ranted for this group. Design, Setting, and Participants: Within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam, 2218 men underwent biopsy of the prostate (from 1993 to 2000) with a benign result at initial screening. The serum PSA was determined every 4 yr. A PSA level of >= 3.0 ng/ml prompted a DRE and a lateralised sextant biopsy. Measurements: Number and characteristics of PCs found at repeat screenings and as interval cancers (ICs) were compared between men with or without a suspicious DRE result at initial screening. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate if an initially suspicious DRE was a significant predictor for detecting cancer at consecutive screenings. Results and Limitations: After 4 yr, the total number of PCs detected in men with and without an initially suspicious DRE was, respectively, 27 (6%) versus 103 (6%) (p = 0.99). After 8 yr these numbers increased, respectively, to,45 (10%) versus 167 (10%) (p = 0.88). The proportion of clinically significant PCs was 2% and 3%, respectively, for the group with initially normal and abnormal DRE after 8 yr. Having a suspicious DRE result at initial screening was not a significant predictor for detecting PC after 4 yr [odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, p = 0.59) or 8 yr (OR = 1.41, p = 0.43)]. A limitation of this study is the relatively short follow-up of 8 yr. Conclusions: During a follow-up of 8 yr after initial cancer-negative biopsy, an initially suspicious DRE did not influence the chance for detection of cancer or significant cancer at later screens. An adaptation of the rescreening interval on the basis of the initial DRE-outcome is not warranted in future population-based screening for prostate cancer. (C) 2008 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 147
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Is it necessary to separate clinical stage T1c from T2 prostate adenocarcinoma? [J].
Armatys, SA ;
Koch, MO ;
Bihrle, R ;
Gardner, TA ;
Cheng, L .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (06) :777-780
[2]   Prostate cancer screening decreases the absolute risk of being diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer - Results from a prospective, population-based randomized controlled trial [J].
Aus, Gunnar ;
Bergdahl, Suante ;
Lodding, Par ;
Liija, Hans ;
Hugosson, Jonas .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (03) :659-664
[3]  
Beemsterboer PMM, 1999, INT J CANCER, V84, P437, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990820)84:4<437::AID-IJC19>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-J
[5]   An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason ≥7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy:: a prospective study of 790 men [J].
Borden, Lester S., Jr. ;
Wright, Jonathan L. ;
Kim, Jason ;
Latchamsetty, Kalyan ;
Porter, Christopher R. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 99 (03) :559-563
[6]   Digital rectal examination for detecting prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levels of 4 ng/ml or less [J].
Carvalhal, GF ;
Smith, DS ;
Mager, DE ;
Ramos, C ;
Catalona, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (03) :835-839
[7]   Serum pro-prostate specific antigen preferentially detects aggressive prostate cancers in men with 2 to 4 ng/ml prostate specific antigen [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Bartsch, G ;
Rittenhouse, HG ;
Evans, CL ;
Linton, HJ ;
Horninger, W ;
Klocker, H ;
Mikolajczyk, SD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (06) :2239-2244
[8]   COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE-CANCER - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL OF 6,630 MEN [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
RICHIE, JP ;
AHMANN, FR ;
HUDSON, MA ;
SCARDINO, PT ;
FLANIGAN, RC ;
DEKERNION, JB ;
RATLIFF, TL ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
DALKIN, BL ;
WATERS, WB ;
MACFARLANE, MT ;
SOUTHWICK, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1283-1290
[9]   Prostate cancer screening: the problem of overdiagnosis and lessons to be learned from breast cancer screening [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Zappa, M ;
Bonardi, R ;
Gervasi, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (11) :1347-1350
[10]  
Eskew LA, 1997, J UROLOGY, V157, P203